Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29332971›Full record

ArticleAnnals of statistics2017

TENSOR DECOMPOSITIONS AND SPARSE LOG-LINEAR MODELS.

James E Johndrow, Anirban Bhattacharya, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficient Decision Trees for Tensor Regressions.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Bayesian nonparametric multiway regression for clustered binomial data.Stat (International Statistical Institute) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James E JohndrowDuke University.
Anirban BhattacharyaTexas A&M University.
David B DunsonDuke University.

Funding

Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Bayesian Methods for High-Dimensional Epidemiologic DataR01ES020619 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020619NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contingency table analysis routinely relies on log-linear models, with latent structure analysis providing a common alternative. Latent structure models lead to a reduced rank tensor factorization of the probability mass function for multivariate categorical data, while log-linear models achieve dimensionality reduction through sparsity. Little is known about the relationship between these notions of dimensionality reduction in the two paradigms. We derive several results relating the support of a log-linear model to nonnegative ranks of the associated probability tensor. Motivated by these findings, we propose a new collapsed Tucker class of tensor decompositions, which bridge existing PARAFAC and Tucker decompositions, providing a more flexible framework for parsimoniously characterizing multivariate categorical data. Taking a Bayesian approach to inference, we illustrate empirical advantages of the new decompositions.

Indexed as

Bayesiancategorical datacontingency tablegraphical modelhigh-dimensionallatent class analysislow rankParafacsparsityTucker

Identifiers

PMID29332971
PMCPMC5764221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.