Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29332850›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2017

Community Advisory Boards Guiding Engaged Research Efforts within a Clinical Translational Sciences Award: Key Contextual Factors Explored.

Jacqueline R Halladay, Katrina E Donahue, Betsy Sleath, Dan Reuland, Adina Black, C Madeline Mitchell, Carol E Breland, Tamera Coyne-Beasley, Kathleen Mottus, Sable Noelle Watson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Community Advisory Board Members Speak Out: Insights From an Opioid Overdose Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Process and Cost of Developing a Community Advisory Board Focused on Opioid Overdose Deaths.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  9. "… Work Really Is Being Done and It's Very Worthwhile …": Reflections from Community Advisory Board Members.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perspective: The role of diversity advisory boards in autism research.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacqueline R Halladay
Katrina E Donahue
Betsy Sleath
Dan Reuland
Adina Black
C Madeline Mitchell
Carol E Breland
Tamera Coyne-Beasley
Kathleen Mottus
Sable Noelle Watson
Virginia Lewis
Mysha Wynn
Giselle Corbie-Smith

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Mentoring in community influences on CVD riskK24HL105493 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CORBIE, GISELLE · 2010 to 2019
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging stakeholders in research carries the promise of enhancing the research relevance, transparency, and speed of getting findings into practice. By describing the context and functional aspects of stakeholder groups, like those working as community advisory boards (CABs), others can learn from these experiences and operationalize their own CABs. Our objective is to describe our experiences with diverse CABs affiliated with our community engagement group within our institution's Clinical Translational Sciences Award (CTSA). We identify key contextual elements that are important to administering CABs.

methodsA group of investigators, staff, and community members engaged in a 6-month collaboration to describe their experiences of working with six research CABs. We identified the key contextual domains that illustrate how CABS are developed and sustained. Two lead authors, with experience with CABs and identifying contextual domains in other work, led a team of 13 through the process. Additionally, we devised a list of key tips to consider when devising CABs.

resultsThe final domains include (1) aligned missions among stakeholders (2) resources/support, (3) defined operational processes/shared power, (4) well-described member roles, and (5) understanding and mitigating challenges. The tips are a set of actions that support the domains.

conclusionsIdentifying key contextual domains was relatively easy, despite differences in the respective CAB's condition of focus, overall mission, or patient demographics represented. By contextualizing these five domains, other research and community partners can take an informed approach to move forward with CAB planning and engaged research.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesAwards and PrizesTranslational Research, BiomedicalCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID29332850
PMCPMC8585511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.