ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2018
Examination of an in vitro methodology to evaluate the biomechanical performance of nucleus augmentation in axial compression.
Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimisation of Intervertebral Disc Mechanical Properties and the Impact of Vertebral Alignment in Subject-Specific Finite Element Models.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Experimental and Computational Comparison of Intervertebral Disc Bulge for Specimen-Specific Model Evaluation Based on Imaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration is one of the leading causes of back pain, but treatment options remain limited. Recently, there have been advances in the development of biomaterials for nucleus augmentation; however, the testing of such materials preclinically has proved challenging. The aim of this study was to develop methods for fabricating and testing bone-disc-bone specimens in vitro for examining the performance of nucleus augmentation procedures. Control, nucleotomy and treated intervertebral disc specimens were fabricated and tested under static load. The nucleus was removed from nucleotomy specimens using a trans-endplate approach with a bone plug used to restore bony integrity. Specimen-specific finite element models were developed to elucidate the reasons for the variations observed between control specimens. Although the computational models predicted a statistically significant difference between the healthy and nucleotomy groups, the differences found experimentally were not significantly different. This is likely due to variations in the material properties, hydration and level of annular collapse. The deformation of the bone was also found to be non-negligible. The study provides a framework for the development of testing protocols for nucleus augmentation materials and highlights the need to control disc hydration and the length of bone retained to reduce inter-specimen variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.