Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29332265›Full record

ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2018

Review of a Parent's Influence on Pediatric Procedural Distress and Recovery.

Erin A Brown, Alexandra De Young, Roy Kimble, Justin Kenardy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond pain privacy and pain meters: a new vision for pain biomarkers.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pain Management in Pediatric Burns: A Review of the Science behind It.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin A BrownCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, University of Queensland, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. erin.brown1@uqconnect.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-1192
Alexandra De YoungCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, University of Queensland, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3093-427X
Roy KimbleCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Centre for Children's Health Research, University of Queensland, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2449-7707
Justin KenardySchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-8450

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how parents influence their child's medical procedures can inform future work to reduce pediatric procedural distress and improve recovery outcomes. Following a pediatric injury or illness diagnosis, the associated medical procedures can be potentially traumatic events that are often painful and distressing and can lead to the child experiencing long-term physical and psychological problems. Children under 6 years old are particularly at risk of illness or injury, yet their pain-related distress during medical procedures is often difficult to manage because of their young developmental level. Parents can also experience ongoing psychological distress following a child's injury or illness diagnosis. The parent and parenting behavior is one of many risk factors for increased pediatric procedural distress. The impact of parents on pediatric procedural distress is an important yet not well-understood phenomenon. There is some evidence to indicate parents influence their child through their own psychological distress and through parenting behavior. This paper has three purposes: (1) review current empirical research on parent-related risk factors for distressing pediatric medical procedures, and longer-term recovery outcomes; (2) consider and develop existing theories to present a new model for understanding the parent-child distress relationship during medical procedures; and (3) review and make recommendations regarding current assessment tools and developing parenting behavior interventions for reducing pediatric procedural distress.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsParentingParentsStress, PsychologicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdultChildHumansBehaviorDistressEmotion regulationMedical procedurePainParentingPediatric

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.