Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29332210›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Pathogen-specific leptospiral proteins in urine of patients with febrile illness aids in differential diagnosis of leptospirosis from dengue.

R Chaurasia, K C Thresiamma, C K Eapen, B J Zachariah, R Paul, M Sritharan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nucleic acid and antigen detection tests for leptospirosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Laboratory Diagnosis of Leptospirosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vaccination WithFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R ChaurasiaDepartment of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Prof. CR Rao Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, India.
K C ThresiammaDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, MOSC Medical College, Kerala, India.
C K EapenDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, MOSC Medical College, Kerala, India.
B J ZachariahDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, MOSC Medical College, Kerala, India.
R PaulDepartments of Biochemistry and Medicine, MOSC Medical College, Kerala, India.
M SritharanDepartment of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Prof. CR Rao Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, India. mssl.uoh@nic.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-2434
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Medical College Hospital · INUniversity of Hyderabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis and dengue are two commonly seen infectious diseases of the tropics. Differential diagnosis of leptospirosis from dengue fever is often difficult due to overlapping clinical symptoms and lack of economically viable and easy-to-perform laboratory tests. The gold standard for diagnosis is the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). In this study, the diagnostic potential of screening for pathogen-specific leptospiral antigens in urine samples is presented as a non-invasive method of disease diagnosis. In a study group of 40 patients, the serum was tested for anti-leptospiral antibodies by MAT and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Urine of these patients was screened for leptospiral antigens by ELISA using specific antibodies against LipL32, LipL41, Fla1, HbpA and sphingomyelinase. Group I patients (n = 23) were classified as leptospirosis-positive based on MAT and high titres of circulating IgM-specific anti-leptospiral antibodies. All of these patients excreted all five leptospiral antigens in the urine. The 17 MAT-negative cases included six patients with pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO; Group II) and 11 confirmed dengue patients (Group III). The latter tested negative for both serum anti-leptospiral antibodies and urinary leptospiral antigens. A salient outcome of this study was highlighting the usefulness of screening for urinary leptospiral antigens in disease diagnosis, as their presence confirmed leptospiral aetiology in two PUO patients. Immunoblots of urinary antigens identified well-defined bands corresponding to LipL32, HbpA and sphingomyelinase; the significance of the 42- and 58-kDa sphingomyelinase bands is discussed.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBlotting, WesternDengueDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLeptospiraLeptospirosisAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29332210
OpenAlexW2782874583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.