Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29331971›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

A study protocol for a non-randomised comparison trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile cognitive-behavioural programme with integrated coaching for anxious adults in primary care.

Eva Szigethy, Francis Solano, Meredith Wallace, Dina L Perry, Lauren Morrell, Kathryn Scott, Megan Jones Bell, Megan Oser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03035019 (Reducing Stress in Primary Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03035019 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing Stress in Primary Care Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2018Enrolled593ConditionsStressArmsLantern
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva SzigethyDepartment of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Francis SolanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Meredith WallaceDepartment of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dina L PerryUPMC Health Services Division, UPMC Community Medicine Inc, Renaissance Family Practice UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lauren MorrellLantern, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kathryn ScottConsumer Health UPMC Enterprises, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Megan Jones BellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Megan OserLantern, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-7858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneralised anxiety disorder (GAD) and subclinical GAD are highly prevalent in primary care. Unmanaged anxiety worsens quality of life in patients seen in primary care practices and leads to increased medical utilisation and costs. Programmes that teach patients cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques have been shown to improve anxiety and to prevent the evolution of anxiety symptoms to disorders, but access and engagement have hampered integration of CBT into medical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic study takes place in University of Pittsburgh Medical Center primary care practices to evaluate a coach-supported mobile cognitive- behavioural programme (Lantern) on anxiety symptoms and quality of life. Clinics were non-randomly assigned to either enhanced treatment as usual or Lantern. All clinics provide electronic screening for anxiety and, within clinics assigned to Lantern, patients meeting a threshold level of mild anxiety (ie, >5 on Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Questionnaire (GAD-7)) are referred to Lantern. The first study phase is aimed at establishing feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. The second phase focuses on long-term impact on psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilisation and clinic/provider adoption/sustainable implementation using a propensity score matched parallel group study design. Primary outcomes are changes in anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey) between baseline and 6-month follow-ups, comparing control and intervention. Secondary outcomes include provider and patient satisfaction, patient engagement, durability of changes in anxiety symptoms and quality of life over 12 months and the impact of Lantern on healthcare utilisation over 12 months. Patients from control sites will be matched to the patients who use the mobile app. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and human subject research approval were obtained. A data safety monitoring board is overseeing trial data and ethics. Results will be communicated to participating primary care practices, published and presented at clinical and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03035019.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health Careanxietycognitive behaviouraldigital healthmhealthprimary carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID29331971
PMCPMC5781102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.