Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29331944›Full record

ReviewGut2018

Liver sampling: a vital window into HBV pathogenesis on the path to functional cure.

Upkar S Gill, Laura J Pallett, Patrick T F Kennedy, Mala K Maini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HBV Suppression by Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Reduces PD-1 Expression on Liver-Resident T Cells.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  7. Navigating the Hepatic Immune Landscape With Fine Needle Aspiration of the Liver-An Emerging Technique.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. People With Hepatitis B Virus/HIV Coinfection Should Be Prioritized in Hepatitis B Virus Cure Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Chronic Hepatitis B Finite Treatment: Similar and Different Concerns With New Drug Classes.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of the HBV liver reservoir with fine needle aspirates.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Upkar S GillDepartment of Hepatology, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Laura J PallettDivision of Infection and Immunity, UCL, London, UK.
Patrick T F KennedyDepartment of Hepatology, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mala K MainiDivision of Infection and Immunity, UCL, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801213Medical Research Council MR/M020126/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101849/Z/13/AWellcome Trust 107389/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to optimally refine the multiple emerging drug targets for hepatitis B virus (HBV), it is vital to evaluate virological and immunological changes at the site of infection. Traditionally liver biopsy has been the mainstay of HBV disease assessment, but with the emergence of non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis, there has been a move away from tissue sampling. Here we argue that liver biopsy remains an important tool, not only for the clinical assessment of HBV but also for research progress and evaluation of novel agents. The importance of liver sampling has been underscored by recent findings of specialised subsets of tissue-resident immune subsets capable of efficient pathogen surveillance, compartmentalised in the liver and not sampled in the blood. Importantly, the assessment of virological parameters, such as cccDNA quantitation, also requires access to liver tissue. We discuss strategies to maximise information obtained from the site of infection and disease pathology. Fine needle aspirates of the liver may allow longitudinal sampling of the local virus/host landscape. The careful utilisation of liver tissue and aspirates in conjunction with blood will provide critical information in the assessment of new therapeutics for the functional cure of HBV.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDNA, ViralHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis B virusHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsDNA, ViralcccDNAfine needle aspiratehepatic fibrosishepatitis Bhistopathologyliver biopsyliver immunologytissue resident cells

Identifiers

PMID29331944
PMCPMC6058064
OpenAlexW2783171768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.