Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29331490›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2018

Supervised Machine Learning for Population Genetics: A New Paradigm.

Daniel R Schrider, Andrew D Kern

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging Genetic Diversity for Abiotic Stress Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Discriminating models of trait evolution.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel R SchriderDepartment of Genetics, and Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08554, USA. Electronic address: dan.schrider@rutgers.edu.
Andrew D KernDepartment of Genetics, and Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08554, USA. Electronic address: kern@biology.rutgers.edu.

Funding

POPULATION GENOMICS OF ADAPTATIONR01GM117241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KERN, ANDREW D · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
Inferring selection from human population genomic dataK99HG008696 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI SCHRIDER, DANIEL R · 2016 to 2017
$121k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG008696NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As population genomic datasets grow in size, researchers are faced with the daunting task of making sense of a flood of information. To keep pace with this explosion of data, computational methodologies for population genetic inference are rapidly being developed to best utilize genomic sequence data. In this review we discuss a new paradigm that has emerged in computational population genomics: that of supervised machine learning (ML). We review the fundamentals of ML, discuss recent applications of supervised ML to population genetics that outperform competing methods, and describe promising future directions in this area. Ultimately, we argue that supervised ML is an important and underutilized tool that has considerable potential for the world of evolutionary genomics.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome, HumanSupervised Machine LearningBiological EvolutionData MiningDatasets as TopicHumansSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID29331490
PMCPMC5905713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.