Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29331233›Full record

ArticleHearing research2018

A biophysical modelling platform of the cochlear nucleus and other auditory circuits: From channels to networks.

Paul B Manis, Luke Campagnola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mammalian octopus cells are direction selective to frequency sweeps by excitatory synaptic sequence detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Dynamic Heterogeneity Shapes Patterns of Spiral Ganglion Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Periodicity Pitch Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Dual Coding of Frequency Modulation in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul B ManisDept. of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, B027 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7070, USA. Electronic address: pmanis@med.unc.edu.
Luke CampagnolaDept. of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, B027 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7070, USA.

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION PROCESSINGR01DC004551 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2000 to 2018
$5.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of the auditory brainstem have been an invaluable tool for testing hypotheses about auditory information processing and for highlighting the most important gaps in the experimental literature. Due to the complexity of the auditory brainstem, and indeed most brain circuits, the dynamic behavior of the system may be difficult to predict without a detailed, biologically realistic computational model. Despite the sensitivity of models to their exact construction and parameters, most prior models of the cochlear nucleus have incorporated only a small subset of the known biological properties. This confounds the interpretation of modelling results and also limits the potential future uses of these models, which require a large effort to develop. To address these issues, we have developed a general purpose, biophysically detailed model of the cochlear nucleus for use both in testing hypotheses about cochlear nucleus function and also as an input to models of downstream auditory nuclei. The model implements conductance-based Hodgkin-Huxley representations of cells using a Python-based interface to the NEURON simulator. Our model incorporates most of the quantitatively characterized intrinsic cell properties, synaptic properties, and connectivity available in the literature, and also aims to reproduce the known response properties of the canonical cochlear nucleus cell types. Although we currently lack the empirical data to completely constrain this model, our intent is for the model to continue to incorporate new experimental results as they become available.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingModels, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochlear NucleusComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID29331233
PMCPMC6053909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.