ReviewClinical endoscopy2018
Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Combined with Laparoscopic Surgery.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid endoscopic and laparoscopic En-bloc resection for the minimally invasive management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A case report.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- 'The parachute method': A novel technique for laparoscopic tumour handling.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Choice of LECS Procedure for Benign and Malignant Gastric Tumors.Journal of gastric cancer · 2021Review
- Recent updates and current issues of sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- Combined Laparoscopic-Endoscopic Techniques for Removal of Small Gastric Tumors: Advantages and Tricks.Clinical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Hybrid NOTES: Complete Endoscopic Resection of the Gastric Wall Assisted by Laparoscopy in a Gastric Fundus Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection combined with laparoscopic surgery was recently developed. These procedures could be categorized as "Cut first and then suture" and "Suture first and then cut". "Cut first and then suture" includes laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) and laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (LAEFR). Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LECS and LAEFR. However, these techniques are limited by the related exposure of the tumor and gastric mucosa to the peritoneal cavity and manipulation of these organs, which could lead to viable cancer cell seeding and the spillage of gastric juice into the peritoneal cavity. In the "Suture first and then cut" technique, the serosal side of the stomach is sutured to invert the stomach and subsequently endoscopic resection is performed. In this article, details of these techniques, including their advantages and limitations, are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.