ArticleThe Laryngoscope2018
Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Childhood Unilateral Hearing Loss (CUHL Trial).The Laryngoscope · 2022Trial
- Electrical stimulation of the cochlea for treatment of chronic disabling tinnitus: an open-label trial towards the development of an implantable device.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Trial
- Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.The Laryngoscope · 2020Trial
- Factors Affecting Audiometric and Speech Perception Outcomes in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Recipients.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Audiometric Outcomes and Longitudinal Trends of Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Bilateral Deafness: A 20-Year Single-Center Study.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2026Article
- A preoperative dose of the pyridoindole AC102 improves the recovery of residual hearing in a gerbil animal model of cochlear implantation.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.Hearing research · 2024Article
- Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Review
- Does the audiogram shape influence the intracochlear recording of Electrocochleography during and after cochlear implantation?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography for Guiding Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Position.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Precision Medicine Approach to Cochlear Implantation.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2022Review
- Molecular aetiology of ski-slope hearing loss and audiological course of cochlear implantees.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Review of Speech Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients at a Nascent Cochlear Implant Program.Cureus · 2022Article
- Can cochlear implantation prevent cognitive decline in the long-term follow-up?Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Resumption of Cochlear Implant Surgery under COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparing the Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users with Three Different Finnish Speech Intelligibility Tests in Noise.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo demonstrate the long-term benefits of implantation in patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, this report provides 5-year follow-up on a group of implant recipients who were subjects of the Cochlear™ Nucleus
methodsThe results of three related clinical studies were compiled to provide outcome data after 1, 3, and 5 years of implant use in a group of subjects who presented with preoperative high-frequency hearing loss and were implanted with a Nucleus Hybrid L24 (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia) cochlear implant. A subset of the 50 adult subjects (N = 32) who participated in the Hybrid L24 pivotal Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) completed comprehensive evaluations at 12 months postactivation, 3 years postactivation, and then as part of a postapproval study at 5 years postactivation. Testing included audiometric, speech perception, and subjective satisfaction measures.
resultsMean unilateral speech perception performance was significantly improved at all postoperative intervals compared to preoperative best-aided results and has remained stable to 5 years postactivation. Ninety-four percent of subjects had measurable hearing, and 72% continued to use electric-acoustic stimulation in the implanted ear after 5 years of implant use. Subjective satisfaction results support objective performance improvements.
conclusionResults demonstrate long-term success of patients with high-frequency hearing loss following Hybrid L24 (Cochlear) cochlear implantation. Benefits include speech perception abilities significantly better than those in the preoperative best-aided condition, with additional benefit in those using electric-acoustic stimulation in the implanted ear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 1939-1945, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.