ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2018
Correction to: Scientific white paper on concentration-QTc modeling.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Nacubactam and Its Metabolites on QTc Interval: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Phase 1 Studies.Clinical and translational science · 2026Pooled it
- No QT interval prolongation effect of sepiapterin: a concentration-QTc analysis of pooled data from phase 1 and phase 3 studies in healthy volunteers and patients with phenylketonuria.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Trial
- Platform Assessment of Concentration-QTc Relationship Across GalNAc-siRNA Molecules.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Concentration-QTc Modeling to Support Clinical Development of Fezolinetant.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026Article
- The pharmacokinetics and Concentration-QTc analysis of a new etomidate analog ET-26-HCl: a phase I trial in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pridopidine Does Not Significantly Prolong the QTc Interval at the Clinically Relevant Therapeutic Dose.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- How to Successfully Generate an Alternative Approach to a Thorough QT Study: GLPG1972 as an Example.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Article
- Estimation of QT interval prolongation through model-averaging.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error in Equation 1 under the section "Pre-specified linear mixed effects model". The correct equation has given below.
Identifiers
29330761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.