Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29330714›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2018

Evidence-Based Recommendations to Improve the Safe Use of Drugs in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

Rianne A Weersink, Margriet Bouma, David M Burger, Joost P H Drenth, S Froukje Harkes-Idzinga, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Herold J Metselaar, Margje H Monster-Simons, Katja Taxis, Sander D Borgsteede

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metamizole-Associated Risks in Decompensated Hepatic Cirrhosis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rianne A WeersinkDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands. rianne.weersink@healthbase.nl.
Margriet BoumaDepartment of Guideline Development, Dutch College of General Practice, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David M BurgerDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joost P H DrenthDepartment of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S Froukje Harkes-IdzingaCenter for Information on Medicines, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Nicole G M HunfeldDepartment of Pharmacy and Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Herold J MetselaarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margje H Monster-SimonsDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katja TaxisDepartment of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sander D BorgsteedeDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLDutch College of General Practitioners · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Dutch Pharmacists Association · NLSIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy · NL

Funding

ZonMw 836044009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presence of liver cirrhosis can have a major impact on pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, but guidance for prescribing is lacking.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to provide an overview of evidence-based recommendations developed for the safe use of drugs in liver cirrhosis.

methodsRecommendations were based on a systematic literature search combined with expert opinion from a panel of 10 experts. The safety of each drug was classified as safe, no additional risks known, additional risks known, unsafe, unknown or the safety class was dependent on the severity of liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classification). If applicable, drug-specific dosing advice was provided. All recommendations were implemented in clinical decision support systems and on a website.

resultsWe formulated 218 recommendations for a total of 209 drugs. For nine drugs, two recommendations were formulated for different administration routes or indications. Drugs were classified as 'safe' in 29 recommendations (13.3%), 'no additional risks known' in 60 (27.5%), 'additional risks known' in 3 (1.4%), and 'unsafe' in 30 (13.8%). In 57 (26.1%) of the recommendations, safety depended on the severity of liver cirrhosis and was 'unknown' in 39 (17.9%) recommendations. Large alterations in pharmacodynamics were the main reason for classifying a drug as 'unsafe'. For 67 drugs (31%), a dose adjustment was needed.

conclusionsOver 200 recommendations were developed for the safe use of drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis. Implementing these recommendations into clinical practice can possibly enhance medication safety in this vulnerable patient group.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansLiver CirrhosisPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID29330714
PMCPMC5966501
OpenAlexW2783306609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.