Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29330607›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2018

River Continuity Restoration and Diadromous Fishes: Much More than an Ecological Issue.

H Drouineau, C Carter, M Rambonilaza, G Beaufaron, G Bouleau, A Gassiat, P Lambert, S le Floch, S Tétard, E de Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

H DrouineauIrstea, UR EABX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France. hilaire.drouineau@irstea.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-0040
C CarterIrstea, UR ETBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
M RambonilazaIrstea, UR ETBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
G BeaufaronEIFER, I Emmy-Noether-Str. 11, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
G BouleauIrstea, UR ETBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
A GassiatIrstea, UR ETBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
P LambertIrstea, UR EABX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
S le FlochIrstea, UR ETBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, 69336, Cestas Cedex, France.
S TétardEDF-R&D, LNHE 6 quai Watier, 78400, Chatou, France.
E de OliveiraEDF-R&D, LNHE 6 quai Watier, 78400, Chatou, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem fragmentation is a serious threat to biodiversity and one of the main challenges in ecosystem restoration. River continuity restoration (RCR) has often targeted diadromous fishes, a group of species supporting strong cultural and economic values and especially sensitive to river fragmentation. Yet it has frequently produced mixed results and diadromous fishes remain at very low levels of abundance. Against this background, this paper presents the main challenges for defining, evaluating and achieving effective RCR. We first identify challenges specific to disciplines. In ecology, there is a need to develop quantitative and mechanistic models to support decision making, accounting for both direct and indirect impacts of river obstacles and working at the river catchment scale. In a context of dwindling abundances and reduced market value, cultural services provided by diadromous fishes are becoming increasingly prominent. Methods for carrying out economic quantification of non-market values of diadromous fishes become ever more urgent. Given current challenges for rivers to meet all needs sustainably, conflicts arise over the legitimate use of water resources for human purposes. Concepts and methods from political science and geography are needed to develop understandings on how the political work of public authorities and stakeholders can influence the legitimacy of restoration projects. Finally, the most exciting challenge is to combine disciplinary outcomes to achieve a multidisciplinary approach to RCR. Accordingly, the co-construction of intermediary objects and diagrams of flows of knowledge among disciplines can be first steps towards new frameworks supporting restoration design and planning.

Indexed as

EcosystemFishesRiversAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcologyGeographyHumansWater MovementsDiadromous fishesEcosystem goods and servicesMultidisciplinary approachPolicyRiver fragmentationTerritory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.