Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29330590›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018

A meta-analysis of pesticide loss in runoff under conventional tillage and no-till management.

Daniel Elias, Lixin Wang, Pierre-Andre Jacinthe

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel EliasDepartment of Earth Sciences, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 W. Michigan Street, SL 118, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Lixin WangDepartment of Earth Sciences, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 W. Michigan Street, SL 118, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Pierre-Andre JacintheDepartment of Earth Sciences, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 W. Michigan Street, SL 118, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. pjacinth@iupui.edu.

Funding

Indiana Water Resources Research Center 104B grant, 4107-73618USDA 2014-51130-22492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global agricultural intensification has led to increased pesticide use (37-fold from 1960 to 2005) and soil erosion (14% since 2000). Conservation tillage, including no-till (NT), has been proposed as an alternative to conventional plow till (PT) to mitigate soil erosion, but past studies have reported mixed results on the effect of conservation tillage on pesticide loss. To explore the underlying factors of these differences, a meta-analysis was conducted using published data on pesticide concentration and load in agricultural runoff from NT and PT fields. Peer-reviewed articles (1985-2016) were compiled to build a database for analysis. Contrary to expectations, results showed greater concentration of atrazine, cyanazine, dicamba, and simazine in runoff from NT than PT fields. Further, we observed greater load of dicamba and metribuzin, but reduced load of alachlor from NT fields. Overall, the concentration and the load of pesticides were greater in runoff from NT fields, especially pesticides with high solubility and low affinity for solids. Thus, NT farming affects soil properties that control pesticide retention and interactions with soils, and ultimately their mobility in the environment. Future research is needed for a more complete understanding of pesticide-soil interactions in NT systems. This research could inform the selection of pesticides by farmers and improve the predictive power of pesticide transport models.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAgricultureAtrazineEnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringPesticidesSoilSoil PollutantsTriazinesAcetamidesalachlorAtrazinecyanazinemetribuzinPesticidesSoilSoil PollutantsTriazinesOctanol-water partition coefficientpHSoil organic matterSolubilityTextureTillage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.