Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29330533›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Soil contamination alters the willow root and rhizosphere metatranscriptome and the root-rhizosphere interactome.

Etienne Yergeau, Julien Tremblay, Simon Joly, Michel Labrecque, Christine Maynard, Frederic E Pitre, Marc St-Arnaud, Charles W Greer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. The remediation potential for PAHs ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Etienne YergeauCentre INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université du Québec, Laval, QC, Canada. Etienne.Yergeau@iaf.inrs.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-3425
Julien TremblayNational Research Council Canada, Energy, Mining and Environment, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Simon JolyInstitut de recherche en biologie végétale, Jardin botanique de Montréal et Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Michel LabrecqueInstitut de recherche en biologie végétale, Jardin botanique de Montréal et Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Christine MaynardNational Research Council Canada, Energy, Mining and Environment, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Frederic E PitreInstitut de recherche en biologie végétale, Jardin botanique de Montréal et Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marc St-ArnaudInstitut de recherche en biologie végétale, Jardin botanique de Montréal et Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Charles W GreerNational Research Council Canada, Energy, Mining and Environment, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8953-7810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoremediation using willows is thought to be a sustainable alternative to traditional remediation techniques involving excavation, transport, and landfilling. However, the complexity of the interaction between the willow and its associated highly diverse microbial communities makes the optimization of phytoremediation very difficult. Here, we have sequenced the rhizosphere metatranscriptome of four willow species and the plant root metatranscriptome for two willow species growing in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated and non-contaminated soils on a former petroleum refinery site. Significant differences in the abundance of transcripts related to different bacterial and fungal taxa were observed between willow species, mostly in contaminated soils. When comparing transcript abundance in contaminated vs. non-contaminated soil for each willow species individually, transcripts for many microbial taxa and functions were significantly more abundant in contaminated rhizosphere soil for Salix eriocephala, S. miyabeana and S. purpurea, in contrast to what was observed in the rhizosphere of S. caprea. This agrees with the previously reported sensitivity of S. caprea to contamination, and the superior tolerance of S. miyabeana and S. purpurea to soil contamination at that site. The root metatranscriptomes of two species were compared and revealed that plants transcripts are mainly influenced by willow species, while microbial transcripts mainly responded to contamination. A comparison of the rhizosphere and root metatranscriptomes in the S. purpurea species revealed a complete reorganization of the linkages between root and rhizosphere pathways when comparing willows growing in contaminated and non-contaminated soils, mainly because of large shifts in the rhizosphere metatranscriptome.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyAnalysis of VarianceBacteriaFungiHydrocarbonsPetroleumPlant RootsSalixSequence Analysis, DNASoil PollutantsHydrocarbonsPetroleumSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID29330533
PMCPMC5864237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.