Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29330528›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Application of Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis for Data from Paired Design.

Jianqiang Li, Doudou Zhou, Weiliang Qiu, Yuliang Shi, Ji-Jiang Yang, Shi Chen, Qing Wang, Hui Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Comprehensive Profiling of the RicePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From Data Mining to Discovery: SNHG11 as a Therapeutic Target in Pulmonary Hypertension.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jianqiang LiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Doudou ZhouFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Weiliang QiuChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yuliang ShiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Ji-Jiang YangTsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. jijiangyang@126.com.
Shi ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academe of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qing WangTsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Hui PanDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academe of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating how genes jointly affect complex human diseases is important, yet challenging. The network approach (e.g., weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)) is a powerful tool. However, genomic data usually contain substantial batch effects, which could mask true genomic signals. Paired design is a powerful tool that can reduce batch effects. However, it is currently unclear how to appropriately apply WGCNA to genomic data from paired design. In this paper, we modified the current WGCNA pipeline to analyse high-throughput genomic data from paired design. We illustrated the modified WGCNA pipeline by analysing the miRNA dataset provided by Shiah et al. (2014), which contains forty oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) specimens and their matched non-tumourous epithelial counterparts. OSCC is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. The modified WGCNA pipeline identified two sets of novel miRNAs associated with OSCC, in addition to the existing miRNAs reported by Shiah et al. (2014). Thus, this work will be of great interest to readers of various scientific disciplines, in particular, genetic and genomic scientists as well as medical scientists working on cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29330528
PMCPMC5766625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.