Distinct modulation of inactivation by a residue in the pore domain of voltage-gated Na

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Cinacalcet inhibition of neuronal action potentials preferentially targets the fast inactivated state of voltage-gated sodium channels.Frontiers in physiology · 2022
   Article
2. Pharmacological and nutritional targeting of voltage-gated sodium channels in the treatment of cancers.iScience · 2021
   Review
3. Variable patterns of mutation density among NaV1.1, NaV1.2 and NaV1.6 point to channel-specific functional differences associated with childhood epilepsy.PloS one · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as