ArticleThe oncologist2018
Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014.
Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Relationship Between Climate Change and Breast Cancer and Its Management and Preventative Implications in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- The "Forgotten" Subtypes of Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Selected Histological Variants Not Included or Not Recognized as Distinct Entities in the Current World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- The longitudinal risk of mortality between invasive ductal carcinoma and metaplastic breast carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Adjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative Metaplastic Breast Cancer With Weekly Paclitaxel and Platinum Chemotherapy: Retrospective Case Review From a Single Institution.Clinical breast cancer · 2019Trial
- A retrospective study of metaplastic breast cancer: Treatment and prognosis through chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy.Medicine · 2026Article
- Genomic Landscape and Therapeutic Implications of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Insights from a Nationwide Database Including Diagnostic Mimickers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metaplastic breast carcinoma versus triple-negative breast cancer: distinct metastatic patterns and inferior overall survival in a matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clonal Dynamics and Molecular Heterogeneity of Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Focus on TP53 and PIK3CA Truncal Mutations.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Metaplastic breast cancer: a clinicopathological analysis of nine cases highlighting diagnostic challenges and aggressive behavior.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- High-grade spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma of the breast in a 15-year-old girl.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Not Associated with Improved Overall Survival in Metaplastic Breast Cancer Regardless of Tumor Subtype.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Metaplastic Breast Cancer Ameliorated Following KEYNOTE-522: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Clinical Implication of Subcategorizing T2 Category in Metaplastic Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- Prognostic nomogram for T3-T4 primary colorectal cancer patients with perineural invasion after surgery: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Pathogenic Germline Variants in Patients With Metaplastic Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast mimicking breast implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma: a challenging differential diagnosis.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2025Article
- Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Survival trends of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma with different hormone receptor statuses: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Analysis of prognostic factors and construction of prognostic models for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Chemotherapy is of prognostic significance to metaplastic breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease subtype characterized by an aggressive clinical course. MBC is commonly triple negative (TN), although hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive cases do occur. Previous studies have reported similar outcomes for MBC with regard to HR status. Less is known about outcomes for HER2 positive MBC. MATERIALS AND
methodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data were used to identify women diagnosed 2010-2014 with MBC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Kaplan-Meier curves estimated overall survival (OS) and multivariate Cox models were fitted. For survival analyses, only first cancers were included, and 2014 diagnoses were excluded to allow for sufficient follow-up.
resultsOur MBC sample included 1,516 women. Relative to women with IDC, women with MBC were more likely to be older (63 vs. 61 years), black (16.0% vs. 11.1%), and present with stage III disease (15.6% vs. 10.8%). HER2 positive and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC tumors represented 5.2% and 23.0% of cases. For MBC overall, 3-year OS was greatest for women with HER2 positive MBC (91.8%), relative to women with TN (75.4%) and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC (77.1%). This difference was more pronounced for stage III MBC, for which 3-year OS was 92.9%, 47.1%, and 42.2% for women with HER2 positive, TN, and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC, respectively. A multivariate Cox model of MBC demonstrated that HER2 positive tumors (relative to TN) were associated with improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.79). In a second Cox model of exclusively HER2 positive tumors, OS did not differ between MBC and IDC disease subtypes (hazard ratio = 1.16, 95% CI 0.48-2.81).
conclusionIn this contemporary, population-based study of women with MBC, HER2 but not HR status was associated with improved survival. Survival was similar between HER2 positive MBC and HER2 positive IDC. This suggests HER2 positive MBC is responsive to HER2-directed therapy, a finding that may offer insights for additional therapeutic approaches to MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This population-based study reports recent outcomes, by receptor status, for women with metaplastic breast cancer. Survival in metaplastic breast cancer is not impacted by hormone receptor status. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report indicating that women with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive metaplastic breast cancer have survival superior to women with HER2 negative metaplastic breast cancer and survival similar to women with HER2 positive invasive ductal carcinoma. This information can be used for counseling patients diagnosed with metaplastic breast cancer. Further understanding of HER2 positive metaplastic breast cancer could offer insights for the development of therapeutic approaches to metaplastic breast cancer more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.