ArticleThe oncologist2018
Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).
Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Sex and Deprivation on Neuroendocrine Tumour Survival: Challenges of Heterogeneous Data.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term safety and efficacy of lanreotide autogel in Japanese patients with neuroendocrine tumors: Final results of a phase II open-label extension study.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2021Trial
- Beyond Tumor Control in Sporadic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Metabolic and Bone Health During Treatment with Somatostatin Analogs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for small gastrointestinal deep-layer lesions: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Patient characteristics and prognostic factors in advanced treatment lines in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Transarterial embolization combined with octreotide long-acting release in treating rectal neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a single-institutional experience.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Systemic therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current landscape and future directions.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
- Comparisons of treatment performance and therapy sequences in neuroendocrine neoplasms using progression-free survival ratios.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Quantification ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Stratification of G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using a Ten Percent Ki-67 index cut-off based on clinicopathological and molecular analyses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic relevance of p53 and Rb status in neuroendocrine tumors G3 from different organs: an immunohistochemical study of 465 high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Diagnosing and treating gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms through comparative analysis: a case series and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Factors Predicting Prognosis in Metastatic Grade 1 Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Distinct clinicopathological features of neuroendocrine liver metastases originating from the pancreas and rectum.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis in rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- SUNLAND: a randomized, double-blinded phase II GERCOR trial of sunitinib versus placebo and lanreotide in patients with advanced progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumors.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- The assessment of Ki-67 for prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Survival and Symptomatic Relief After Cytoreductive Hepatectomy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: Long-Term Follow-up Evaluation of More Than 500 Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a complex family of tumors of widely variable clinical behavior. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification provided a valuable tool to stratify neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in three prognostic subgroups based on the proliferation index. However, substantial heterogeneity remains within these subgroups, and simplicity sometimes entails an ambiguous and imprecise prognostic stratification. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of histological differentiation within the WHO 2010 grade (G) 1/G2/G3 categories, and explore additional Ki-67 cutoff values in GEP-NENs. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND
methodsA total of 2,813 patients from the Spanish National Tumor Registry (RGETNE) were analyzed. Cases were classified by histological differentiation as NETs (neuroendocrine tumors [well differentiated]) or NECs (neuroendocrine carcinomas [poorly differentiated]), and by Ki-67 index as G1 (Ki-67 <2%), G2 (Ki-67 3%-20%), or G3 (Ki-67 >20%). Patients were stratified into five cohorts: NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, NEC-G2, and NEC-G3.
resultsFive-year survival was 72%. Age, gender, tumor site, grade, differentiation, and stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Further subdivision of the WHO 2010 grading improved prognostic stratification, both within G2 (5-year survival: 81% [Ki-67 3%-5%], 72% [Ki-67 6%-10%], 52% [Ki-67 11%-20%]) and G3 NENs (5-year survival: 35% [Ki-67 21%-50%], 22% [Ki-67 51%-100%]). Five-year survival was significantly greater for NET-G2 versus NEC-G2 (75.5% vs. 58.2%) and NET-G3 versus NEC-G3 (43.7% vs. 25.4%).
conclusionSubstantial clinical heterogeneity is observed within G2 and G3 GEP-NENs. The WHO 2010 classification can be improved by including the additive effect of histological differentiation and the proliferation index. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are tumors of widely variable clinical behavior, roughly stratified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification into three subgroups based on proliferation index. Real-world data from 2,813 patients of the Spanish Registry RGETNE demonstrated substantial clinical heterogeneity within grade (G) 2 and G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumor morphology and further subdivision of grading substantially improves prognostic stratification of these patients and may help individualize therapy. This combined, additive effect shall be considered in future classifications of neuroendocrine tumors and incorporated for stratification purposes in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.