Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329589›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2018

Enhanced metastatic capacity of breast cancer cells after interaction and hybrid formation with mesenchymal stroma/stem cells (MSC).

Catharina Melzer, Juliane von der Ohe, Ralf Hass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The double-positive cells in the tumor microenvironment.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. How Do Cancer Cells Fuse and Why?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Mapping cell-cell fusion at single-cell resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell Fusion and Syncytia Formation in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  17. Mechanisms of Cell Fusion in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catharina MelzerBiochemistry and Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, D-30625, Germany.
Juliane von der OheBiochemistry and Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, D-30625, Germany.
Ralf HassBiochemistry and Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, D-30625, Germany. hass.ralf@mh-hannover.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-7547
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFusion of breast cancer cells with tumor-associated populations of the microenvironment including mesenchymal stroma/stem-like cells (MSC) represents a rare event in cell communication whereby the metastatic capacity of those hybrid cells remains unclear.

methodsFunctional changes were investigated in vitro and in vivo following spontaneous fusion and hybrid cell formation between primary human MSC and human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Thus, lentiviral eGFP-labeled MSC and breast cancer cells labeled with mcherry resulted in dual-fluorescing hybrid cells after co-culture.

resultsDouble FACS sorting and single cell cloning revealed two different aneuploid male hybrid populations (MDA-hyb1 and MDA-hyb2) with different STR profiles, pronounced telomerase activities, and enhanced proliferative capacities as compared to the parental cells. Microarray-based mRNA profiling demonstrated marked regulation of genes involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and increased expression of metastasis-associated genes including S100A4. In vivo studies following subcutaneous injection of the breast cancer and the two hybrid populations substantiated the in vitro findings by a significantly elevated tumor growth of the hybrid cells. Moreover, both hybrid populations developed various distant organ metastases in a much shorter period of time than the parental breast cancer cells.

conclusionTogether, these data demonstrate spontaneous development of new tumor cell populations exhibiting different parental properties after close interaction and subsequent fusion of MSC with breast cancer cells. This formation of tumor hybrids contributes to continuously increasing tumor heterogeneity and elevated metastatic capacities.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplasm InvasivenessRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicRNA, Small InterferingS100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4TelomeraseBreast cancerCell fusionHybrid cellsMesenchymal stem cellsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29329589
PMCPMC5795285
OpenAlexW2782265922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.