Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329542›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2018

Relative validity of a web-based food frequency questionnaire for Danish adolescents.

Anne A Bjerregaard, Thorhallur I Halldorsson, Freja B Kampmann, Sjurdur F Olsen, Inge Tetens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne A BjerregaardCenter for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark. anne@ssi.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-5292
Thorhallur I HalldorssonCenter for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Freja B KampmannDivision for Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Food, Kemitorvet, building, 202, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Sjurdur F OlsenCenter for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Inge TetensVitality - Centre for Good Older Lives, Department of Nutrition, Exercise, and Sports, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Intramural Research Program of The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health HHSN275201000020CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000020CThe Danish Research Council 09-067124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increased focus on dietary intake among youth and risk of diseases later in life, it is of importance, prior to assessing diet-disease relationships, to examine the validity of the dietary assessment tool. This study's objective was to evaluate the relative validity of a self-administered web-based FFQ among Danish children aged 12 to 15 years.

methodsFrom a nested sub-cohort within the Danish National Birth Cohort, 124 adolescents participated. Four weeks after completion of the FFQ, adolescents were invited to complete three telephone-based 24HRs; administered 4 weeks apart. Mean or median intakes of nutrients and food groups estimated from the FFQ were compared with the mean of 3x24HRs. To assess the level of ranking we calculated the proportion of correctly classified into the same quartile, and the proportion of misclassified (into the opposite quartile). Spearman's correlation coefficients and de-attenuated coefficients were calculated to assess agreement between the FFQ and 24HRs.

resultsThe mean percentage of all food groups, for adolescents classified into the same and opposite quartile was 35 and 7.5%, respectively. Mean Spearman's correlation was 0.28 for food groups and 0.35 for nutrients, respectively. Adjustment for energy and within-person variation in the 24HRs had little effect on the magnitude of the correlations for food groups and nutrients. We found overestimation by the FFQ compared with the 24HRs for fish, fruits, vegetables, oils and dressing and underestimation by the FFQ for meat/poultry and sweets. Median intake of beverages, dairy, bread, cereals, the mean total energy and carbohydrate intake did not differ significantly between the two methods.

conclusionThe relative validity of the FFQ compared with the 3x24HRs showed that the ranking ability differed across food groups and nutrients with best ranking for estimated intake of dairy, fruits, and oils and dressing. Larger variation was observed for fish, sweets and vegetables. For nutrients, the ranking ability was acceptable for fatty acids and iron. When evaluating estimates from the FFQ among Danish adolescents these findings should be considered.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsNutrition AssessmentAdolescentCohort StudiesDenmarkDietDiet SurveysFemaleHumansInternetMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCohort studyDietDietary assessmentDietary intakeDiet recallFood groupsNutrientsSchool-age children

Identifiers

PMID29329542
PMCPMC5767066
OpenAlexW2783005185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.