Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2018
A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Intravenous Meloxicam in the Treatment of Pain Following Dental Impaction Surgery.
Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00945763 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Design, Single-Dose Study of Intravenous N1539 in the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Dental Impaction Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Design, Single-Dose Study of Intravenous N1539 in the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Dental Impaction Surgery
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analgesic efficacy of meloxicam vs ibuprofen on pain after third molar surgery in adult patients. A randomized controlled clinical trial.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Meloxicam for Moderate-to-Severe Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2021Trial
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Safety of Intravenous Meloxicam Following Major Surgery.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2019Trial
- Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Meloxicam in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Pain After Open Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2019Trial
- Review
- Article
- Feed supplementation with potentiated zinc and/or tannin-rich extracts reduces ETEC infection severity and antimicrobial resistance genes in pig.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Pudendal nerve block decreases narcotic requirements and time spent in post-anesthesia care units in patients undergoing primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Novel Intravenous Formulation of Meloxicam (QP001) in Healthy Chinese Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Article
- Budget Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Intravenous Meloxicam to Treat Moderate-Severe Postoperative Pain.Advances in therapy · 2022Article
- Efficacy of non-opioid analgesics to control postoperative pain: a network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Article
- Platelet Function: Meloxicam Intravenous in Whole Blood Samples From Healthy Volunteers.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2020Article
- A New Insight into Meloxicam: Assessment of Antioxidant and Anti-Glycating Activity in In Vitro Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Safety, Tolerability, and Effect on Opioid Use of Meloxicam IV Following Orthopedic Surgery.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Meloxicam in Subjects with Moderate-to-severe Pain Following Abdominoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018Article
- Meloxicam in the management of post-operative pain: Narrative review.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyReview
- Pain management strategies in penile implantation.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized, controlled phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of single intravenous (IV) doses of 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg meloxicam compared with oral ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo after dental impaction surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the sum of time-weighted pain intensity differences for 0-24 hours postdose. Among 230 evaluable subjects, meloxicam IV 60 mg produced the greatest reduction in pain, followed by the 30-mg and 15-mg doses. Statistically significant differences in summed pain intensity differences over 24 hours were demonstrated for each active-treatment group vs placebo (favoring active treatment) and for meloxicam IV 30 mg and 60 mg vs ibuprofen 400 mg (favoring meloxicam IV). Moreover, there was a statistically significant dose response for meloxicam IV 15 mg to 60 mg. The onset of action for meloxicam IV was rapid and sustained; significant differences in pain intensity differences were detected as early as 10 minutes postdose and lasted through the 24-hour postdose period. Subjects in the meloxicam IV groups were more likely than placebo recipients to achieve perceptible and meaningful pain relief and were less likely to use rescue medication. Patient-reported global evaluation showed that meloxicam IV 60 mg had the highest rating. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. The incidence of subjects with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event was greatest in the placebo group, followed by the groups that received ibuprofen, meloxicam IV 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg. Nausea was the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00945763.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.