Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329493›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2018

A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Intravenous Meloxicam in the Treatment of Pain Following Dental Impaction Surgery.

Steven E Christensen, Stephen A Cooper, Randall J Mack, Stewart W McCallum, Wei Du, Alex Freyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00945763 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Design, Single-Dose Study of Intravenous N1539 in the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Dental Impaction Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00945763 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Adaptive Design, Single-Dose Study of Intravenous N1539 in the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Dental Impaction Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlkermes, Inc.Ran2009 to 2009Enrolled230ConditionsDental PainArmsN1539, placebo, Motrin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Meloxicam in the management of post-operative pain: Narrative review.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven E ChristensenJean Brown Research, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Stephen A CooperStephen A. Cooper, LLC, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA.
Randall J MackRecro Pharma, Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
Stewart W McCallumRecro Pharma, Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
Wei DuClinical Statistics Consulting, Blue Bell, PA, USA.
Alex FreyerRecro Pharma, Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USJean Brown Research · USMontgomery County Community College · USPalm Beach Gardens Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized, controlled phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of single intravenous (IV) doses of 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg meloxicam compared with oral ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo after dental impaction surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the sum of time-weighted pain intensity differences for 0-24 hours postdose. Among 230 evaluable subjects, meloxicam IV 60 mg produced the greatest reduction in pain, followed by the 30-mg and 15-mg doses. Statistically significant differences in summed pain intensity differences over 24 hours were demonstrated for each active-treatment group vs placebo (favoring active treatment) and for meloxicam IV 30 mg and 60 mg vs ibuprofen 400 mg (favoring meloxicam IV). Moreover, there was a statistically significant dose response for meloxicam IV 15 mg to 60 mg. The onset of action for meloxicam IV was rapid and sustained; significant differences in pain intensity differences were detected as early as 10 minutes postdose and lasted through the 24-hour postdose period. Subjects in the meloxicam IV groups were more likely than placebo recipients to achieve perceptible and meaningful pain relief and were less likely to use rescue medication. Patient-reported global evaluation showed that meloxicam IV 60 mg had the highest rating. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. The incidence of subjects with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event was greatest in the placebo group, followed by the groups that received ibuprofen, meloxicam IV 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg. Nausea was the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00945763.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIbuprofenMaleMeloxicamPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTooth ExtractionTooth, ImpactedYoung AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofenMeloxicamacute postoperative paincyclooxygenase-2 inhibitordental impaction surgeryintravenousmeloxicamnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugssum of pain intensity differences

Identifiers

PMID29329493
PMCPMC5947566
OpenAlexW2782731897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.