Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329492›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018

Failure to confirm high blood pressures in pediatric care-quantifying the risks of misclassification.

Corinna Koebnick, Yasmina Mohan, Xia Li, Amy H Porter, Matthew F Daley, Gang Luo, Beatriz D Kuizon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recognizing elevated blood pressure in pediatrics: the value of repeated measures.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinna KoebnickDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8274-0309
Yasmina MohanDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Xia LiDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Amy H PorterLos Angeles Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew F DaleyInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Gang LuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Beatriz D KuizonLos Angeles Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric practice guidelines call for repeating an elevated office blood pressure (BP) at the same visit, but there are few data available to support this recommendation. We compared the visit results in children aged 3 to 17 years with a BP reading ≥95th percentile (n = 186 732) based on the initial BP and the mean of two BP readings, using electronic medical records from 2012-2015. Failure to repeat an initial BP reading ≥95th percentile would lead to a false "hypertensive" visit result in 54.1% of children who would require follow-up visits. After an initial visit result indicating hypertension, hypertension stage I or stage II was sustained in 2.3% and 11.3% of youth during their next visits, respectively. In conclusion, only approximately half of the pediatric patients would be correctly classified based on their initial BP. The recommendation to repeat high BP during the same visit needs to be emphasized because it saves unnecessary follow-up visits.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAdolescentBlood PressureChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePediatricsUnited Statesblood pressurechildrenguidelineshypertensionscreening

Identifiers

PMID29329492
PMCPMC8031137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.