Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329456›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Designing and evaluating an automated system for real-time medication administration error detection in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Yizhao Ni, Todd Lingren, Eric S Hall, Matthew Leonard, Kristin Melton, Eric S Kirkendall

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yizhao NiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Todd LingrenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Eric S HallDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Matthew LeonardDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kristin MeltonDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Eric S KirkendallDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Better Outcomes for Children: Promoting Excellence in Healthcare Genomics to Inform PolicyU01HG008666 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER · 2015 to 2019
$4.2M
Improving Intensive Care Medication Safety through EHR-basedAlgorithms.R01LM012230 · NLM · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI KIRKENDALL, ERIC STEVEN, MELTON, KRISTIN · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R21 HS024983NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008666NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Timely identification of medication administration errors (MAEs) promises great benefits for mitigating medication errors and associated harm. Despite previous efforts utilizing computerized methods to monitor medication errors, sustaining effective and accurate detection of MAEs remains challenging. In this study, we developed a real-time MAE detection system and evaluated its performance prior to system integration into institutional workflows. Methods: Our prospective observational study included automated MAE detection of 10 high-risk medications and fluids for patients admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center during a 4-month period. The automated system extracted real-time medication use information from the institutional electronic health records and identified MAEs using logic-based rules and natural language processing techniques. The MAE summary was delivered via a real-time messaging platform to promote reduction of patient exposure to potential harm. System performance was validated using a physician-generated gold standard of MAE events, and results were compared with those of current practice (incident reporting and trigger tools). Results: Physicians identified 116 MAEs from 10 104 medication administrations during the study period. Compared to current practice, the sensitivity with automated MAE detection was improved significantly from 4.3% to 85.3% (P = .009), with a positive predictive value of 78.0%. Furthermore, the system showed potential to reduce patient exposure to harm, from 256 min to 35 min (P < .001). Conclusions: The automated system demonstrated improved capacity for identifying MAEs while guarding against alert fatigue. It also showed promise for reducing patient exposure to potential harm following MAE events.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMedical Order Entry SystemsRisk ManagementComputer SystemsElectronic Health RecordsHumansInfant, NewbornMedication ErrorsPharmaceutical PreparationsProspective StudiesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID29329456
PMCPMC6018990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.