Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329443›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2018

Bone formation in ankylosing spondylitis during anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy imaged by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Stefan T G Bruijnen, Nicki J F Verweij, Leonie M van Duivenvoorde, Nathalie Bravenboer, Dominique L P Baeten, Christiaan J van Denderen, Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Martijn Custers, Peter M van de Ven and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validation of quantitative [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Differentiation of axial spondyloarthritis-related lesions from degenerative lesions on Na[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Na[EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  5. Molecular imaging of psoriatic arthritis.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. [Biomolecules · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. JBMR plus · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Osteoimmunology of Spondyloarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Performance ofArthritis research & therapy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan T G BruijnenDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicki J F VerweijDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leonie M van DuivenvoordeDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nathalie BravenboerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dominique L P BaetenDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christiaan J van DenderenReade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene E van der Horst-BruinsmaDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandre E VoskuylDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn CustersDepartment of Rheumatology, Maartenskliniek, Woerden, The Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost C J BotDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bouke J H BodenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriaan A LammertsmaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Otto S H HoekstraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter G H M RaijmakersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Conny J van der LakenDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLReade · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Excessive bone formation is an important hallmark of AS. Recently it has been demonstrated that axial bony lesions in AS patients can be visualized using 18F-fluoride PET-CT. The aim of this study was to assess whether 18F-fluoride uptake in clinically active AS patients is related to focal bone formation in spine biopsies and is sensitive to change during anti-TNF treatment. Methods: Twelve anti-TNF-naïve AS patients [female 7/12; age 39 years (SD 11); BASDAI 5.5 ± 1.1] were included. 18 F-fluoride PET-CT scans were performed at baseline and in two patients, biopsies were obtained from PET-positive and PET-negative spine lesions. The remaining 10 patients underwent a second 18F-fluoride PET-CT scan after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. PET scans were scored visually by two blinded expert readers. In addition, 18F-fluoride uptake was quantified using the standardized uptake value corrected for individual integrated whole blood activity concentration (SUVAUC). Clinical response to anti-TNF was defined according to a ⩾ 20% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria at 24 weeks. Results: At baseline, all patients showed at least one axial PET-positive lesion. Histological analysis of PET-positive lesions in the spine confirmed local osteoid formation. PET-positive lesions were found in the costovertebral joints (43%), facet joints (23%), bridging syndesmophytes (20%) and non-bridging vertebral lesions (14%) and in SI joints (75%). After 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment, 18F-fluoride uptake in clinical responders decreased significantly in the costovertebral (mean SUVAUC -1.0; P < 0.001) and SI joints (mean SUVAUC -1.2; P = 0.03) in contrast to non-responders. Conclusions: 18F-fluoride PET-CT identified bone formation, confirmed by histology, in the spine and SI joints of AS patients and demonstrated alterations in bone formation during anti-TNF treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsBiopsyFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Follow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOsteogenesisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSpineAntirheumatic AgentsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID29329443
PMCPMC5888961
OpenAlexW4251191440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.