ArticlePloS one2018
Medication discrepancies across multiple care transitions: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study in Italy.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Clinical Pharmacists-Led Medication Reconciliation to Prevent Medication Discrepancies in Hospitalized Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2024Article
- Optimizing Subsequent CARdiovascular Medication Reintroduction in the Intensive Care Unit.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2024Article
- A Multi-method Exploratory Evaluation of a Service Designed to Improve Medication Safety for Patients with Monitored Dosage Systems Following Hospital Discharge.Drug safety · 2023Article
- The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and interprofessional ward rounds on drug-related problems at hospital discharge.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- The value of incorporating patient-consulted medication reconciliation in influencing drug-related actions in the outpatient rheumatology setting.BMC health services research · 2022Observational
- Usability and perceived usefulness of patient-centered medication reconciliation using a personalized health record: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Risk factors for clinically relevant deviations in patients' medication lists reported by patients in personal health records: a prospective cohort study in a hospital setting.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Article
- An Integrated Model to Improve Medication Reconciliation in Oncology: Prospective Interventional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Medication discrepancies among hospitalized patients with hypertension: assessment of prevalence and risk factors.BMC health services research · 2021Observational
- Prevalence of medication discrepancies in pediatric patients transferred between hospital wards.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the medication reconciliation process and classification of discrepancies at hospital admission and discharge in Italy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Observational
- Medication reconciliation: time to save? A cross-sectional study from one acute hospital.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Frequency of undocumented medication discrepancies in discharge letters after hospitalization of older patients: a clinical record review study.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMedication discrepancies are defined as unexplained differences among regimens across different sites of care. The problem of medication discrepancies that occur during the entire care pathway from hospital admission to a local care setting discharge (namely all types of settings dedicated to formal care other than hospitals) has received little attention in the medical literature. The present study aims to (1) determine the prevalence of medication discrepancies that occur during the entire care pathway from hospital admission to local care setting discharge, (2) describe the discrepancy and medication type, and (3) identify potential risk factors for experiencing medication discrepancies in patient care transitions. Evidence from an integrated health care system, such as the Italian one, may explain results from other studies in different healthcare systems.
methodsA retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients admitted from July 2015 to July 2016 to the Giovanni Bosco Hospital serving Turin, Italy and its surrounding territory was performed. Discrepancies were recorded at the following four care transitions: T1: Hospital admission; T2: Hospital discharge; T3: Admission into local care settings; T4: Discharge from local care settings. All evaluations were based on documented regimens and were performed by a team (doctor, nurse and pharmacists).
resultsOf 366 included patients, 25.68% had at least one discrepancy. The most frequent type of discrepancy was from medication omission (N = 74; 71.15%). Only discharge from a long-stay care setting (T4) was significantly associated with the onset of discrepancies (p = 0.045). When considering a lack of adequate documentation, not as missing data but as a discrepancy, 43.72% of patients had at least one discrepancy.
conclusionsThis study suggests that an integrated health care system, such as Italian system, may influence the prevalence of discrepancies, thus highlighting the need for structured multidisciplinary and, if possible, computerized medication reconciliation to prevent medication discrepancies and improve the quality of medical documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.