Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29329266›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Relative Validity of a 24-h Recall in Assessing Intake of Key Nutrients in a Cohort of Australian Toddlers.

Elizabeth Beaton, Janine Wright, Gemma Devenish, Loc Do, Jane Scott

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sources and Determinants of Wholegrain Intake in a Cohort of Australian Children Aged 12-14 Months.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants and Sources of Iron Intakes of Australian Toddlers: Findings from the SMILE Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth BeatonSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia. elizabeth.beaton@postgrad.curtin.edu.au.
Janine WrightSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia. j.wright@exchange.curtin.edu.au.
Gemma DevenishSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia. gemma.devenish@curtin.edu.au.
Loc DoAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. loc.do@adelaide.edu.au.
Jane ScottSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia. jane.scott@curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0765-9054
Curtin University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited information concerning the dietary intake of toddlers in Australia. Consequently, there is a need for studies investigating toddler intake that use dietary assessment measures that are valid and place a low participant burden on caregivers. The aim of this study was to determine the relative validity of a single 24-h dietary recall (24HR) in measuring the intake of five nutrients in a cohort of Australian toddlers compared to a combined 24HR and 2-day estimated food record (2DFR). A single 24HR and a 2DFR were collected from a cohort of Australian toddlers (

Indexed as

Mental RecallNutrition AssessmentChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDietDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsHumansMicronutrientsReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsMicronutrients24-h dietary recallfood recordnutrient intakerelative validitytoddlers

Identifiers

PMID29329266
PMCPMC5793308
OpenAlexW2782559346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.