Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29328778›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2018

Engineering Approaches to Study Cellular Decision Making.

Pamela K Kreeger, Laura E Strong, Kristyn S Masters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Simple, Affordable, and Modular Patterning of Cells using DNA.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021
    Article
  8. 3D Reconstruction of the Clarified Rat Hindbrain Choroid Plexus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Many Microenvironments of Ovarian Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Insights From the Ecology of Information to Cancer Control.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pamela K KreegerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA; email: kreeger@wisc.edu , kmasters@wisc.edu.
Laura E StrongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA; email: kreeger@wisc.edu , kmasters@wisc.edu.
Kristyn S MastersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA; email: kreeger@wisc.edu , kmasters@wisc.edu.

Funding

Analysis of how quantitative cellular network variation impacts tumor progressionDP2CA195766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KREEGER, PAMELA K · 2014 to 2014
$2.3M
Creating Engineered Models of Valvular Disease to Study Anti-Calcific TherapiesR01HL093281 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MASTERS, KRISTYN S · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
Combinatorial analysis of migration stimuli for enhanced wound healingR01GM099031 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MASTERS, KRISTYN S · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
Identification of novel therapeutic targets for age-related macular degeneration via a combined tissue engineering and systems biology approachR21EY026222 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MASTERS, KRISTYN S · 2016 to 2017
$434k
Development of Complex Culture Systems to Study Valvular DysfunctionR21EB019508 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MASTERS, KRISTYN S · 2015 to 2016
$404k
Impact of soluble and physical stimuli on tumor angiogenesis and drug sensitivityR21CA202040 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KREEGER, PAMELA K, MASTERS, KRISTYN S · 2016 to 2017
$366k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA195766NCI NIH HHS R21 CA202040NEI NIH HHS R21 EY026222NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093281NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB019508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their native environment, cells are immersed in a complex milieu of biochemical and biophysical cues. These cues may include growth factors, the extracellular matrix, cell-cell contacts, stiffness, and topography, and they are responsible for regulating cellular behaviors such as adhesion, proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation. The decision-making process used to convert these extracellular inputs into actions is highly complex and sensitive to changes both in the type of individual cue (e.g., growth factor dose/level, timing) and in how these individual cues are combined (e.g., homotypic/heterotypic combinations). In this review, we highlight recent advances in the development of engineering-based approaches to study the cellular decision-making process. Specifically, we discuss the use of biomaterial platforms that enable controlled and tailored delivery of individual and combined cues, as well as the application of computational modeling to analyses of the complex cellular decision-making networks.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomedical EngineeringCell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationComputer SimulationExtracellular MatrixHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLigandsMiceMicrofluidicsPressureSignal TransductionTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLigandscell–cell communicationextracellular matrixgrowth factorsintracellular signalingmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID29328778
PMCPMC6327838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.