ArticlePhysical review letters2017
One-Parameter Scaling Theory for DNA Extension in a Nanochannel.
Article in Physical review letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limitations of the equivalent neutral polymer assumption for theories describing nanochannel-confined DNA.Physical review. E · 2020Article
- Direct observation of confinement-induced diffusophoresis.Nanotechnology · 2019Article
- Extension distribution for DNA confined in a nanochannel near the Odijk regime.The Journal of chemical physics · 2019Article
- Simulations corroborate telegraph model predictions for the extension distributions of nanochannel confined DNA.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Nanoplumbing with 2D Metamaterials.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019Article
- Article
- Alpha-Synuclein Modulates the Physical Properties of DNA.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018Article
- Measuring the wall depletion length of nanoconfined DNA.The Journal of chemical physics · 2018Article
- Distribution of label spacings for genome mapping in nanochannels.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Blob Theory for the Diffusion of DNA in Nanochannels.Macromolecules · 2018Article
- Odijk excluded volume interactions during the unfolding of DNA confined in a nanochannel.Macromolecules · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Experiments measuring DNA extension in nanochannels are at odds with even the most basic predictions of current scaling arguments for the conformations of confined semiflexible polymers such as DNA. We show that a theory based on a weakly self-avoiding, one-dimensional "telegraph" process collapses experimental data and simulation results onto a single master curve throughout the experimentally relevant region of parameter space and explains the mechanisms at play.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.