Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327706›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Nuclear grade and necrosis predict prognosis in malignant epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: a multi-institutional study.

Lauren E Rosen, Theodore Karrison, Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan, Alexander J Gallan, Prasad S Adusumilli, Fouad S Alchami, Richard Attanoos, Luka Brcic, Kelly J Butnor, Françoise Galateau-Sallé and 23 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pleural mesothelioma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Correlation of Histologic Features with Gene Alterations in Pleural Mesothelioma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An Evaluation Into the Robustness of Grading of Pleural Mesothelioma Outside of Specialist Centres.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Diffuse Pleural Mesotheliomas with Genomic Near-Haploidization: A Newly Recognized Subset with Distinct Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.

Lauren E RosenDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theodore KarrisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vijayalakshmi AnanthanarayananDepartment of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexander J GallanDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Prasad S AdusumilliDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-2046
Fouad S AlchamiDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Richard AttanoosDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales and Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Luka BrcicMedical University of Graz, Institute of Pathology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9098-8416
Kelly J ButnorDepartment of Pathology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Françoise Galateau-SalléCentre Léon Bérard, BioPathologie, Lyon, France.
Kenzo HiroshimaDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan.
Kyuichi KadotaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan.
Astero KlampatsaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nolween Le StangCentre Léon Bérard, BioPathologie, Lyon, France.
Joerg LindenmannDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery,Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Leslie A Litzky,Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alberto MarchevskyDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Filomena MedeirosBasildon & Thurrock University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Basildon, UK.
M Angeles MonteroDepartment of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Imperial College of London, London, UK.
David A MooreDepartment of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kazuki NabeshimaFukuoka University, Department of Pathology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Elizabeth N PavliskoDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Victor L RoggliDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer L SauterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anupama SharmaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael SheaffDepartment of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
William D TravisDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Wickii T VigneswaranDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bart VrugtUniversity Hospital Zurich, Institute for Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ann E WaltsDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Melissa Y TjotaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Thomas KrauszDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aliya N HusainDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCentre Léon Bérard · FRDuke Medical Center · USLoyola University Medical Center · USMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USBarts Health NHS Trust · GBBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBChicago Department of Public Health · USFukuoka University · JPHarefield Hospital · GBKagawa University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recently described nuclear grading system predicted survival in patients with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. The current study was undertaken to validate the grading system and to identify additional prognostic factors. We analyzed cases of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma from 17 institutions across the globe from 1998 to 2014. Nuclear grade was computed combining nuclear atypia and mitotic count into a grade of I-III using the published system. Nuclear grade was assessed by one pathologist for three institutions, the remaining were scored independently. The presence or absence of necrosis and predominant growth pattern were also evaluated. Two additional scoring systems were evaluated, one combining nuclear grade and necrosis and the other mitotic count and necrosis. Median overall survival was the primary endpoint. A total of 776 cases were identified including 301 (39%) nuclear grade I tumors, 354 (45%) grade II tumors and 121 (16%) grade III tumors. The overall survival was 16 months, and correlated independently with age (P=0.006), sex (0.015), necrosis (0.030), mitotic count (0.001), nuclear atypia (0.009), nuclear grade (<0.0001), and mitosis and necrosis score (<0.0001). The addition of necrosis to nuclear grade further stratified overall survival, allowing classification of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma into four distinct prognostic groups: nuclear grade I tumors without necrosis (29 months), nuclear grade I tumors with necrosis and grade II tumors without necrosis (16 months), nuclear grade II tumors with necrosis (10 months) and nuclear grade III tumors (8 months). The mitosis-necrosis score stratified patients by survival, but not as well as the combination of necrosis and nuclear grade. This study confirms that nuclear grade predicts survival in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma, identifies necrosis as factor that further stratifies overall survival, and validates the grading system across multiple institutions and among both biopsy and resection specimens. An alternative scoring system, the mitosis-necrosis score is also proposed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell NucleusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedNecrosisNeoplasm GradingPleural NeoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29327706
OpenAlexW2783573668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.