ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Classification and characterization of postural transitions using instrumented shoes.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy middle-aged female adults in Germany.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Leveraging Wearable Sensors for Human Daily Activity Recognition with Stacked Denoising Autoencoders.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Postural transitions detection and characterization in healthy and patient populations using a single waist sensor.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The frequency and quality of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit postural transitions decrease with age and are highly relevant for fall risk assessment. Accurate classification and characterization of these transitions in daily life of older adults are therefore needed. In this study, we propose to use instrumented shoes for postural transition classification as well as transition duration estimation from insole force signals. In the first part, data were collected with 10 older adults and 10 young participants performing transitions in the laboratory while wearing the instrumented shoes, without arm assistance. A wavelet approach was used to transform the insole force data, and candidate events were selected for transition duration estimation. Transition durations were then validated against a model based on force plate reference. Vertical force estimation was also compared to force plate measurement. In the second part, postural transitions were classified in daily life using the instrumented shoes and validated against a highly accurate wearable system. Transition duration was estimated with an error ranging from 10 to 20% while the error for vertical force estimation was 7%. Postural transition classification was achieved with excellent sensitivity and precision exceeding 90%. In conclusion, the instrumented shoes are suitable for classifying and characterizing postural transitions in daily life conditions of healthy older adults. Graphical abstract "Experimental setup showing instrumented shoes, reference force plate, as well as IMUs used for postural transition classification and duration estimation comparison".
Indexed as
Identifiers
29327335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.