Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327314›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2018

Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Angela W C Lee, Caroline Mendonca Costa, Marina Strocchi, Christopher A Rinaldi, Steven A Niederer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational Modelling Enabling In Silico Trials for Cardiac Physiologic Pacing.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024
    Review
  7. Effects of cardiac growth on electrical dyssynchrony in the single ventricle patient.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The saga of dyssynchrony imaging: Are we getting to the point.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Utility of Body Surface Potential Mapping in CRT Patients.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021
    Review
  15. Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela W C LeeSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. angela.lee@kcl.ac.uk.
Caroline Mendonca CostaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Marina StrocchiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher A RinaldiDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Steven A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/101/29212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with an electrical substrate pathology causing ventricular dyssynchrony. However 40-50% of patients do not respond to treatment. Cardiac modeling of the electrophysiology, electromechanics, and hemodynamics of the heart has been used to study mechanisms behind HF pathology and CRT response. Recently, multi-scale dyssynchronous HF models have been used to study optimal device settings and optimal lead locations, investigate the underlying cardiac pathophysiology, as well as investigate emerging technologies proposed to treat cardiac dyssynchrony. However the breadth of patient and experimental data required to create and parameterize these models and the computational resources required currently limits the use of these models to small patient numbers. In the future, once these technical challenges are overcome, biophysically based models of the heart have the potential to become a clinical tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of HF.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesHemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingVentricular FunctionClinical Decision-MakingEquipment DesignHeart FailureHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient SelectionPrognosisCardiac resynchronisation therapyComputer-based modelElectromechanical modelingElectrophysiology modelingHemodynamic modelingLeft bundle branch block

Identifiers

PMID29327314
PMCPMC5908824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.