Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327219›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2018

Pharmacological Insights into the Use of Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Relevance.

Manon Auffret, Sophie Drapier, Marc Vérin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Device aided therapies in Parkinson disease: an expert view on apomorphine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural Product-Inspired Dopamine Receptor Ligands.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Night-Time Apomorphine Infusion: Who Are the Best Candidates?Movement disorders clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Apomorphine effects on the hippocampus.Neural regeneration research · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manon Auffret"Behavior and Basal Ganglia" Research Unit (EA 4712), University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France. auffret.manon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-4084
Sophie Drapier"Behavior and Basal Ganglia" Research Unit (EA 4712), University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Marc Vérin"Behavior and Basal Ganglia" Research Unit (EA 4712), University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Hôpital Pontchaillou · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper consists of a comprehensive review of the literature on apomorphine pharmacological properties and its usefulness in Parkinson's disease (PD). The chemistry, structure-activity relationship, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of apomorphine are described with regard to its effects on PD symptoms, drug interactions, interindividual variability and adverse events. Apomorphine chemical structure accounts for most of its beneficial and deleterious properties, both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic. Its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are complex and subject to interindividual variability, particularly for subcutaneous absorption and metabolism. Subcutaneous apomorphine, either as injections or infusion, is particularly useful for the treatment of PD motor symptoms and growing evidence supports its clinical value for nonmotor disorders. Owing to interindividual variability and sensitivity, apomorphine treatment must be tailored to each patient. While the subcutaneous route has been the gold standard for decades, the search for alternative routes is ongoing, with promising results from studies of pulmonary, sublingual and transdermal routes. In addition, the potential of apomorphine as a disease-modifying therapy deserves to be investigated, as well as its ability to induce brain plasticity through chronic infusion. Moreover, the ongoing progress in the development of analytical methods should be accompanied by new pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of apomorphine metabolism and sites of action in humans, as its biochemistry has yet to be fully described.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiparkinson AgentsApomorphineBrainDrug InteractionsHumansParkinson DiseaseStructure-Activity RelationshipAntiparkinson AgentsApomorphine

Identifiers

PMID29327219
OpenAlexW2782612366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.