Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327201›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2018

Allele-Specific Biased Expression of the CNTN6 Gene in iPS Cell-Derived Neurons from a Patient with Intellectual Disability and 3p26.3 Microduplication Involving the CNTN6 Gene.

Maria M Gridina, Natalia M Matveeva, Veniamin S Fishman, Aleksei G Menzorov, Helen A Kizilova, Nikolay A Beregovoy, Igor I Kovrigin, Inna E Pristyazhnyuk, Igor P Oscorbin, Maxim L Filipenko and 7 more

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Functional Divergence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Cre-LoxP-based approach for combinatorial chromosome rearrangements in human HAP1 cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maria M GridinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-5949
Natalia M MatveevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Veniamin S FishmanInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Aleksei G MenzorovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Helen A KizilovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Nikolay A BeregovoyInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia.
Igor I KovriginNovosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Inna E PristyazhnyukInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Igor P OscorbinInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Maxim L FilipenkoInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Anna A KashevarovaResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Nikolay A SkryabinResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Tatyana V NikitinaResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Elena A SazhenovaResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Ludmila P NazarenkoResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Igor N LebedevResearch Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
Oleg L SerovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. serov@bionet.nsc.ru.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 14-15-00772-П
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) of the human CNTN6 gene caused by megabase-scale microdeletions or microduplications in the 3p26.3 region are often the cause of neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability and developmental delay. Surprisingly, patients with different copy numbers of this gene display notable overlapping of neuropsychiatric symptoms. The complexity of the study of human neuropathologies is associated with the inaccessibility of brain material. This problem can be overcome through the use of reprogramming technologies that permit the generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from fibroblasts and their subsequent in vitro differentiation into neurons. We obtained a set of iPS cell lines derived from a patient carrier of the CNTN6 gene duplication and from two healthy donors. All iPS cell lines displayed the characteristics of pluripotent cells. Some iPS cell lines derived from the patient and from healthy donors were differentiated in vitro by exogenous expression of the Ngn2 transcription factor or by spontaneous neural differentiation of iPS cells through the neural rosette stage. The obtained neurons showed the characteristics of mature neurons as judged by the presence of neuronal markers and by their electrophysiological characteristics. Analysis of allele-specific expression of the CNTN6 gene in these neuronal cells by droplet digital PCR demonstrated that the level of expression of the duplicated allele was significantly reduced compared to that of the wild-type allele. Importantly, according to the sequencing data, both copies of the CNTN6 gene, which were approximately 1 Mb in size, showed no any additional structural rearrangements.

Indexed as

AllelesGene Expression RegulationAdolescentAdultAnimalsBase SequenceBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromosome DuplicationChromosomes, Human, Pair 3ContactinsFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIntellectual DisabilityKaryotypingMice, SCIDBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCNTN6 protein, humanContactinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNEUROG2 protein, human3p26.3 microduplicationAllele-specific expressionCNTN6 geneInduced pluripotent stem cellsIntellectual disabilityin vitro neural differentiation

Identifiers

PMID29327201
OpenAlexW2783399003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.