Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327188›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Temporal variation in bacterial and methanogenic communities of three full-scale anaerobic digesters treating swine wastewater.

Gyuseong Han, Seung Gu Shin, Kyungjin Cho, Joonyeob Lee, Woong Kim, Seokhwan Hwang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gyuseong HanSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, 790-784, Republic of Korea.
Seung Gu ShinDepartment of Energy Engineering, Future Convergence Technology Research Institute, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Jinju, South Korea.
Kyungjin ChoCenter for Water Resource Cycle Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 39-1, Hawolgok-Dong, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, 136-791, Republic of Korea.
Joonyeob LeeSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, 790-784, Republic of Korea.
Woong KimDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea. elshine@knu.ac.kr.
Seokhwan HwangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, 790-784, Republic of Korea. shwang@postech.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effects of temporal variations of process parameters on microbial community structures in the two types of full-scale anaerobic digester treating swine wastewater, three full-scale anaerobic digesters were monitored. An anaerobic filter (AF)-type digester located in Gong-Ju (GJ) showed the highest COD removal among three digesters and maintained stable efficiency. A digester in Hong-Seong (HS) was of the same type as it GJ and showed improved efficiency over the sampling period. A continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR)-type digester in Soon-Cheon (SC) showed decreasing efficiency due to a high residual concentration of VFAs and NH

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnaerobiosisAnimalsBioreactorsMethaneSewageSwineWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterMethaneSewageWastewaterAnaerobic digestionDigester typeFull-scale, swine wastewaterMicrobial communityMultivariate analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.