Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29327165›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

Measurement of cardiac valve and aortic blood flow velocities in stroke patients: a comparison of 4D flow MRI and echocardiography.

Thomas Wehrum, Felix Guenther, Alexander Fuchs, Florian Schuchardt, Anja Hennemuth, Andreas Harloff

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MR Imaging in Aortic Valvular and Congenital Heart Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas WehrumDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. thomas.wehrum@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-4363
Felix GuentherHeart Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander FuchsDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Florian SchuchardtDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anja HennemuthFraunhofer Mevis, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas HarloffDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft #HA5399/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

4D flow MRI is an emerging technique that allows quantification of 3D blood flow in vivo. However, comparisons with methods of blood velocity quantification used in clinical routine are sparse. Therefore, we compared velocity quantification using 4D flow MRI with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography at the mitral and aortic valves and the aorta. Forty-eight stroke patients (age 67.3 ± 15.0 years) were examined by 4D flow MRI. Blood flow velocities were assessed using standardized 2D analysis planes positioned in the mitral valve (MV), aortic valve (AV), ascending aorta (AAo), and descending aorta (DAo) and were compared with echocardiography. MRI showed moderate-high correlations of systolic velocity values for the MV (r = 0.67, p < 0.001), AV (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), AAo (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), and DAo (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) along with moderate-high intraclass-correlation-coefficients: MV 0.79 (95% CI 0.62, 0.88), AV 0.86 (95% CI 0.75, 0.92), AAo 0.96 (95% CI 0.93, 0.98), and DAo 0.83 (95% CI 0.70, 0.90). However, MRI underestimated absolute systolic blood flow velocities compared with echocardiography by 8.6% for the MV (p = 0.07), 3.1% for the AV (p = 0.48), 10.7% for the AAo (p = 0.09), and 15.0% for the DAo (p = 0.01). Blood flow velocities obtained using 4D flow MRI and echocardiography at the MV, AV, and the ascending and DAo showed moderate to high correlations. Underestimation of absolute velocity values by MRI was low. Thus, 4D flow MRI seems ideally suited to comprehensively assess cardiac and aortic pathologies and related hemodynamic changes in future studies.

Indexed as

Blood Flow VelocityAgedAged, 80 and overAortaAortic ValveEchocardiographyEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleHemodynamicsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMitral ValvePredictive Value of Tests4D flow MRIAortaAtherosclerosisHeart valveTEEVelocity

Identifiers

PMID29327165
OpenAlexW2782621233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.