Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326930›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2017

Dana C Bellissimo, Nancy A Speck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Case Report: A rareFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of microRNA-363 during tumor progression and invasion.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. PHF6 suppresses self-renewal of leukemic stem cells in AML.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An Old Dog Has a New Trick: Somatic Exonic Deletions in RUNX1 Are Frequent in AML.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana C BellissimoDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Nancy A SpeckDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

HEMATOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007439 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAWRENCE F BRASS, PETER S KLEIN · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell and progenitor cell proliferation by Runx1R01CA149976 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SPECK, NANCY · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Mutations in Runx1 and epigenetic modifiers cooperate in leukemogenesisF30CA196123 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BELLISSIMO, DANA · 2015 to 2016
$95k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA196123NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149976NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

familial platelet disorder with predisposition for acute myeloid leukemialeukemialeukemia predispositionmyeloid neoplasmspre-leukemiaRUNX1

Identifiers

PMID29326930
PMCPMC5742424
OpenAlexW2777836840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.