ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
iTRAQ-Based Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Seedling Leaves of Two Upland Cotton Genotypes Differing in Salt Tolerance.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome and GWAS analysis identified genes significantly related to phenotypic state ofHorticulture research · 2024Article
- Photosynthetic machinery under salinity stress: Trepidations and adaptive mechanisms.Photosynthetica · 2023Review
- Systematical Characterization of the CottonAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genomic and GWAS analyses demonstrate phylogenomic relationships of Gossypium barbadense in China and selection for fibre length, lint percentage and Fusarium wilt resistance.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- iTRAQ Proteomic Analysis of Wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Physiological and Proteomic Analysis Responsive Mechanisms for Salt Stress in Oat.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- An overview of salinity stress, mechanism of salinity tolerance and strategies for its management in cotton.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Article
- Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Molecular Differences between Leaves of Wild-Type Upland Cotton and ItsMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Salinity stress in cotton: effects, mechanism of tolerance and its management strategies.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019Review
- Proteomic and physiological responses in mangroveTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2019Article
- iTRAQ-Based Comparative Proteomic Analysis Provides Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet (International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- QTL Mapping of Fiber Quality and Yield-Related Traits in an Intra-Specific Upland Cotton Using Genotype by Sequencing (GBS).International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton yields are greatly reduced under high salinity stress conditions, although cotton is considered a moderately salt-tolerant crop. Understanding at the molecular level how cotton responds to salt stress will help in developing salt tolerant varieties. Here, we combined physiological analysis with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomics of seedling leaves of 2 genotypes differing in salinity tolerance to 200 mM (18.3 dS/m) NaCl stress. Salt stress produced significant stress symptoms in the sensitive genotype Nan Dan Ba Di Da Hua (N), including lower relative water and chlorophyll contents and higher relative electrolyte leakage and Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.