ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry
Isolation and Typing of
Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Streptococci Biotypes in Primary and Permanent Caries: A Case-Control Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- Insights into the enigma of oral streptococci in carcinogenesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Anti-Bacterial Effect of Cannabidiol against the CariogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial activity of a novel Spanish propolis against planktonic and sessile oral Streptococcus spp.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Detection of multidrug-resistantVeterinary world · 2021Article
- Determination of antibacterial activity and metabolite profile ofJournal of laboratory physiciansArticle
- Predictors of Caries Risk among Egyptian Children Attending Pediatric Dental Clinics at a University Hospital.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
aimThe aim of the study was to isolate, identify, characterize, and determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-five plaque samples were collected from caries-active subjects aged between 35 and 44 years, processed and cultured on mitis salivarius bacitracin agar. All the bacterial isolates were subjected to morphotyping and the suspected colonies were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing. The
resultsOf the study population, 41 isolates displayed typical colony morphologies of
conclusionThe 16S rDNA sequencing was an impeccable method for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.