Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326430›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Cancer2018

EMT in cancer.

Thomas Brabletz, Raghu Kalluri, M Angela Nieto, Robert A Weinberg

Abstract readInterview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,230 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,230citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
92.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,230 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,951 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Immune Response, and Extracellular Matrix Remodelling in Oral Cancer.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1,170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas BrabletzDepartment of Experimental Medicine 1, Nikolaus-Fiebiger Center for Molecular Medicine, FAU University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstr. 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Raghu KalluriDepartment of Cancer Biology, Metastasis Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77054, USA.
M Angela NietoInstituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, Avda. Ramón y Cajal s/n, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Robert A WeinbergWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Ludwig Massachusetts Institute for Technology (MIT) Center for Molecular Oncology and MIT Department of Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEInstituto de Neurociencias · ESThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similar to embryonic development, changes in cell phenotypes defined as an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) have been shown to play a role in the tumorigenic process. Although the first description of EMT in cancer was in cell cultures, evidence for its role in vivo is now widely reported but also actively debated. Moreover, current research has exemplified just how complex this phenomenon is in cancer, leaving many exciting, open questions for researchers to answer in the future. With these points in mind, we asked four scientists for their opinions on the role of EMT in cancer and the challenges faced by scientists working in this fast-moving field.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29326430
OpenAlexW2783337717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.