Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326317›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of ophthalmology2018

Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin at the end of cataract surgery: a meta-analysis.

Randy C Bowen, Andrew Xingyu Zhou, Sailaja Bondalapati, Thomas W Lawyer, Karisa B Snow, Patrick R Evans, Tyler Bardsley, Mary McFarland, Matthew Kliethermes, Dallas Shi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03968341 (Intraocular Concentrations Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03968341 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Intraocular Concentrations Study (Aqueous Humor, Vitreous Humor) of Antibiotics After Local and/or Systemic Administration in Endophthalmitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2020 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsEndophthalmitisArmsPharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of antibiotics used in severe endophthalmitis from samples taken from treated patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Randy C BowenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Andrew Xingyu ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sailaja BondalapatiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Thomas W LawyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Karisa B SnowDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Patrick R EvansDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Tyler BardsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Mary McFarlandDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Matthew KliethermesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Dallas ShiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christina A MamalisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Tom GreeneDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christopher J RudniskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Balamurali Krishna AmbatiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Bryan William Jones · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
The Role of Soluble Flt-1 and Raver2 in Ocular Vascular DemarcationsR01EY017950 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AMBATI, BALAMURALI K · 2008 to 2021
$5.2M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Intraceptor Interference of VEGF PathwaysR01EY017182 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AMBATI, BALAMURALI K · 2007 to 2017
$3.6M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017182NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent practice methods are unclear as to the most safe and effective prophylactic pharmacotherapy and method of delivery to reduce postoperative endophthalmitis occurrence.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis using Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines was performed to compare the efficacy of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin in preventing postphacoemulsification cataract surgery endophthalmitis. A safety analysis of intracameral antibiotics was concurrently performed. DATA SOURCES: BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Dissertations & Theses, EMBASE, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus were searched from inception to January 2017. Data were pooled using a random effects model. All articles were individually reviewed and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Funnel plot, risk of bias and quality of evidence analyses were performed.

resultsSeventeen studies with over 900 000 eyes were included, which favoured the use of intracameral antibiotics at the end of cataract surgery (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.32; P<0.00001). The average weighted postoperative endophthalmitis incidence rates with intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin were 0.0332%, 0.0153% and 0.0106%, respectively. Secondary analyses showed no difference in efficacy between intracameral plus topical antibiotics versus intracameral alone (P>0.3). Most studies had low to moderate risk of bias. The safety analysis showed minimal toxicity for moxifloxacin. Dosing errors led to the majority of toxicities with cefuroxime. Although rare, vancomycin was associated with toxic retinal events.

conclusionIntracameral cefuroxime and moxifloxacin reduced endophthalmitis rates compared with controls with minimal or no toxicity events at standard doses. Additionally, intracameral antibiotics alone may be as effective as intracameral plus topical antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anterior ChamberAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCataract ExtractionCefuroximeEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialHumansInjections, IntraocularIntraoperative PeriodMoxifloxacinVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefuroximeMoxifloxacinVancomycindrugsinfectiontreatment medicaltreatment surgery

Identifiers

PMID29326317
PMCPMC6041193
OpenAlexW2783049615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.