Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326306›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2018

Weekly Standard Kt/V

Matthew B Rivara, Vanessa Ravel, Elani Streja, Yoshitsugu Obi, Melissa Soohoo, Alfred K Cheung, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, Rajnish Mehrotra

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for people with kidney failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Pay-for-performance programs effectiveness in healthcare: the case of the end-stage renal disease quality incentive program.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Narrative Review of Incremental Hemodialysis.Kidney international reports · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The Nitty-Gritties of Kt/VIndian journal of nephrology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew B RivaraKidney Research Institute, Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-2769-6469
Vanessa RavelHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California; and.
Elani StrejaHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California; and.
Yoshitsugu ObiHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California; and.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-4383
Melissa SoohooHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California; and.
Alfred K CheungDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jonathan HimmelfarbKidney Research Institute, Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kamyar Kalantar-ZadehHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California; and.
Rajnish MehrotraKidney Research Institute, Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN RENAL DISEASET32DK007467 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BANSAL, NISHA, KESTENBAUM, BRYAN R · 1986 to 2023
$5.1M
Comparative Effectiveness of Dialysis ModalitiesR01DK095668 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR, MEHROTRA, RAJNISH · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095668NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPatients undergoing hemodialysis with a frequency other than thrice weekly are not included in current clinical performance metrics for dialysis adequacy. The weekly standard Kt/V DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used multivariable regression to examine the association of dialysis standard Kt/V

resultsAfter adjustment for potential confounders, patients with dialysis standard Kt/V

conclusionsCurrent targets for standard Kt/V

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesHemodialysis, HomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBicarbonatesBlood PressureCalciumDialysis SolutionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferBicarbonatesCalciumDialysis SolutionsPhosphorusPotassiumUreaBicarbonatesblood pressureBlood Pressure Determinationcalcium bicarbonateConfidence IntervalsEpidemiology and outcomeshemodialysis adequacyHemodialysis, Homehospitalizationmortality riskOdds RatioPhosphorusPotassiumrenal dialysisRisk

Identifiers

PMID29326306
PMCPMC5967669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.