Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326296›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2018

Intrathecal baclofen therapy versus conventional medical management for severe poststroke spasticity: results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label trial (SISTERS).

Michael Creamer, Geoffrey Cloud, Peter Kossmehl, Michael Yochelson, Gerard E Francisco, Anthony B Ward, Jörg Wissel, Mauro Zampolini, Abdallah Abouihia, Nathalie Berthuy and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01032239 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment on Severe Spasticity in Post-stroke Patients After 6 Months Active Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronicNeuroRan2009 to 2016Enrolled61ConditionsSevere SpasticityArmsintrathecal baclofen
NCT07744659 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Spasticity: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Sham-controlled Trial (SCS-PSS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Pins Medical Co., LtdRan2026 to 2027Enrolled92ConditionsSpasticity Post StrokeArmsActive spinal cord stimulation, Sham spinal cord stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sustained Baclofen-Induced Activation of GABAFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spasticity: Longitudinal Data From the Product Surveillance Registry.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael CreamerCentral Florida Pain Relief Centers, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Geoffrey CloudSt. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter KossmehlKliniken Beelitz GmbH Neurologische Rehabilitationsklinik, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany.
Michael YochelsonMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
Gerard E FranciscoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anthony B WardNorth Staffordshire Rehabilitation Centre, Haywood Hospital, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Jörg WisselDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Berlin, Germany.
Mauro ZampoliniDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ospedale di Foligno, USL Umbria 2, Perugia, Italy.
Abdallah AbouihiaNeuromodulation Clinical, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
Nathalie BerthuyNeuromodulation Clinical, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
Alessandra CalabreseNeuromodulation Clinical, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
Meghann LovenMedtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Leopold SaltuariAbteilung für Neurologie, Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria.
Medtronic (Switzerland) · CHCentral Florida Pulmonary Group · USHaywood Community Hospital · GBLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · USMedtronic (United States) · USNeurologisches Fachkrankenhaus für Bewegungsstörungen/Parkinson · DESt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a treatment option for patients with severe poststroke spasticity (PSS) who have not reached their therapy goal with other interventions.

methods'Spasticity In Stroke-Randomised Study' (SISTERS) was a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre phase IV study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITB therapy versus conventional medical management (CMM) with oral antispastic medications for treatment of PSS. Patients with chronic stroke with spasticity in ≥2 extremities and an Ashworth Scale (AS) score ≥3 in at least two affected muscle groups in the lower extremities (LE) were randomised (1:1) to ITB or CMM. Both treatment arms received physiotherapy throughout. The primary outcome was the change in the average AS score in the LE of the affected body side from baseline to month 6. Analyses were performed for all patients as randomised (primary analysis) and all randomised patients as treated (safety analysis).

resultsOf 60 patients randomised to ITB (n=31) or CMM (n=29), 48 patients (24 per arm) completed the study. The primary analysis showed a significant effect of ITB therapy over CMM (mean AS score reduction, -0.99 (ITB) vs -0.43 (CMM); Hodges-Lehmann estimate, -0.667(95.1%CI -1.0000 to -0.1667); P=0.0140). More patients reported adverse events while receiving ITB (24/25 patients, 96%; 149 events) compared with CMM (22/35, 63%; 77 events), although events were generally consistent with the known safety profile of ITB therapy.

conclusionsThese data support the use of ITB therapy as an alternative to CMM for treatment of generalised PSS in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01032239; Results.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBaclofenDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Relaxants, CentralMuscle SpasticityRecovery of FunctionStrokeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBaclofenMuscle Relaxants, Central

Identifiers

PMID29326296
PMCPMC6031277
OpenAlexW2783126610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.