Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326197›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

PARENTS 2 study protocol: pilot of Parents' Active Role and ENgagement in the review of Their Stillbirth/perinatal death.

Danya Bakhbakhi, Dimitrios Siassakos, Claire Storey, Alexander Heazell, Mary Lynch, Laura Timlin, Christy Burden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bereaved parents involvement in maternity hospital perinatal death review processes: 'Nobody even thought to ask us anything'.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danya BakhbakhiCentre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1906-5069
Dimitrios SiassakosCentre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Claire StoreyInternational Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK.
Alexander HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biological, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mary LynchCentre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Laura TimlinCentre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Christy BurdenCentre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Women's Health, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perinatal mortality review meeting that takes place within the hospital following a stillbirth or neonatal death enables clinicians to learn vital lessons to improve care for women and their families for the future. Recent evidence suggests that parents are unaware that a formal review following the death of their baby takes place. Many would welcome the opportunity to feedback into the meeting itself. Parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review meeting has the potential to improve patient satisfaction, drive improvements in patient safety and promote an open culture within healthcare. Yet evidence on the feasibility of involving bereaved parents in the review process is lacking. This paper describes the protocol for the Parents' Active Role and Engangement iN the review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death study (PARENTS 2) , whereby healthcare professionals' and stakeholders' perceptions of parental involvement will be investigated, and parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review will be piloted and evaluated at two hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will investigate perceptions of parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process by conducting four focus groups. A three-round modified Delphi technique will be employed to gain a consensus on principles of parental involvement in the perinatal mortality review process. We will use three sequential rounds, including a national consensus meeting workshop with experts in stillbirth, neonatal death and bereavement care, and a two-stage anonymous online questionnaire. We will pilot a new perinatal mortality review process with parental involvement over a 6-month study period. The impact of the new process will be evaluated by assessing parents' experiences of their care and parents' and staff perceptions of their involvement in the process by conducting further focus groups and using a Parent Generated Index questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the UK Health Research Authority. We will disseminate the findings through national and international conferences and international peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

BereavementHospital-Patient RelationsParentsPatient ParticipationPerinatal DeathStillbirthAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHospice CareHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornMalehealthcare improvementneonatal deathparental involvementperinatal mortality review processstillbirth

Identifiers

PMID29326197
PMCPMC5781014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.