ArticleBMJ open2018
Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- The several faces of the medicalization of birth. Italy and its peculiarities.Frontiers in sociology · 2023Article
- Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- The partner's experiences of childbirth in countries with a highly developed clinical setting: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Does giving birth in a "birth environment room" versus a standard birth room lower augmentation of labor? - Results from a randomized controlled trial.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2021Article
- Client-care provider interaction during labour and birth as experienced by women: Respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy.PloS one · 2021Article
- Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Oxytocin and emergency caesarean section in a mediumsized hospital in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study.European journal of midwifery · 2020Article
- Inter-institutional variations in oxytocin augmentation during labour in German university hospitals: a national survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2018
Authors and funding
17 authors at 16 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are growing concerns about the increase in rates of commonly used childbirth interventions. When indicated, childbirth interventions are crucial for preventing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, but their routine use in healthy women and children leads to avoidable maternal and neonatal harm. Establishing ideal rates of interventions can be challenging. This study aims to describe the range of variations in the use of commonly used childbirth interventions in high-income countries around the world, and in outcomes in nulliparous and multiparous women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multinational cross-sectional study will use data from births in 2013 with national population data or representative samples of the population of pregnant women in high-income countries. Data from women who gave birth to a single child from 37 weeks gestation onwards will be included and the results will be presented for nulliparous and multiparous women separately. Anonymised individual level data will be analysed. Primary outcomes are rates of commonly used childbirth interventions, including induction and/or augmentation of labour, intrapartum antibiotics, epidural and pharmacological pain relief, episiotomy in vaginal births, instrument-assisted birth (vacuum or forceps), caesarean section and use of oxytocin postpartum. Secondary outcomes are maternal and perinatal mortality, Apgar score below 7 at 5 min, postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric anal sphincter injury. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses will be conducted to investigate variations among countries, adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, gestational weight gain, ethnic background, socioeconomic status and infant birth weight. The overall mean rates will be considered as a reference category, weighted for the size of the study population per country. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Review Committee of VU University Medical Center Amsterdam confirmed that an official approval of this study was not required. Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.