Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326182›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.

Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Thomas van den Akker, Katrien Beeckman, Annick Bogaerts, Monalisa Barros, Patricia Janssen, Lorena Binfa, Eva Rydahl, Lucy Frith, Mechthild M Gross and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 13 countries.

Anna Seijmonsbergen-SchermersDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-2205
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katrien BeeckmanNursing and Midwifery Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Annick BogaertsDepartment of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Monalisa BarrosUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.
Patricia JanssenUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lorena BinfaDepartment of Women's and New Born Health Promotion-School of Midwifery Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Eva RydahlDepartment of Midwifery, Metropolitan University College, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lucy FrithDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mechthild M GrossMidwifery Research and Education Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Berglind HálfdánsdóttirMidwifery Programme, Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Deirdre DalySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jean Calleja-AgiusDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Tal-Qroqq, Malta.
Patricia GillenInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, UK.
Anne Britt Vika NilsenWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL), Bergen, Norway.
Eugene DeclercqBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ank de JongeDepartment of Midwifery Science, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-3744
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLBoston University · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMetropolitan University College · DKSouthwest Bahia State University · BRTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Chile · CLUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Ulster · GBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are growing concerns about the increase in rates of commonly used childbirth interventions. When indicated, childbirth interventions are crucial for preventing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, but their routine use in healthy women and children leads to avoidable maternal and neonatal harm. Establishing ideal rates of interventions can be challenging. This study aims to describe the range of variations in the use of commonly used childbirth interventions in high-income countries around the world, and in outcomes in nulliparous and multiparous women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multinational cross-sectional study will use data from births in 2013 with national population data or representative samples of the population of pregnant women in high-income countries. Data from women who gave birth to a single child from 37 weeks gestation onwards will be included and the results will be presented for nulliparous and multiparous women separately. Anonymised individual level data will be analysed. Primary outcomes are rates of commonly used childbirth interventions, including induction and/or augmentation of labour, intrapartum antibiotics, epidural and pharmacological pain relief, episiotomy in vaginal births, instrument-assisted birth (vacuum or forceps), caesarean section and use of oxytocin postpartum. Secondary outcomes are maternal and perinatal mortality, Apgar score below 7 at 5 min, postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric anal sphincter injury. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses will be conducted to investigate variations among countries, adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, gestational weight gain, ethnic background, socioeconomic status and infant birth weight. The overall mean rates will be considered as a reference category, weighted for the size of the study population per country. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Review Committee of VU University Medical Center Amsterdam confirmed that an official approval of this study was not required. Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesAdultAnesthesia, EpiduralAnti-Bacterial AgentsCesarean SectionCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedOxytocinPostpartum PeriodPregnancyAnti-Bacterial AgentsOxytocincaesarean sectionchildbirth interventionsepisiotomyinstrumental deliveryinternational variationsmaternal and perinatal outcmes

Identifiers

PMID29326182
PMCPMC5780680
OpenAlexW2783677226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.