Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326139›Full record

GuidelineAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Carotid Artery Wall Imaging: Perspective and Guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology.

L Saba, C Yuan, T S Hatsukami, N Balu, Y Qiao, J K DeMarco, T Saam, A R Moody, D Li, C C Matouk and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice GuidelineConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Guideline in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05907629 (Comparison of Anti-coagulation and Anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis- Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 166 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05907629 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Anti-coagulation and Anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis- Magnetic Resonance Imaging

TypeobservationalSponsorYale UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsStroke, Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis (ICAS)ArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

L SabaFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (L.S.), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy lucasaba@tiscali.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-3771
C YuanDepartments of Radiology (C.Y., N.B., M.M.-B.).ORCID 0000-0002-2109-9850
T S HatsukamiSurgery (T.S.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-0129-5846
N BaluDepartments of Radiology (C.Y., N.B., M.M.-B.).ORCID 0000-0002-1489-6683
Y QiaoThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (Y.Q., B.A.W.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0499-9283
J K DeMarcoDepartment of Radiology (J.K.D.), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-2497
T SaamDepartment of Radiology (T.S.), Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-1641
A R MoodyDepartment of Medical Imaging (A.R.M.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-4305
D LiBiomedical Imaging Research Institute (D.L., Z.F.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8560-8231
C C MatoukDepartments of Neurosurgery, Neurovascular and Stroke Programs (C.C.M., M.H.J.).ORCID 0000-0003-3234-9541
M H JohnsonDepartments of Neurosurgery, Neurovascular and Stroke Programs (C.C.M., M.H.J.).ORCID 0000-0001-6838-8257
H R JägerNeuroradiological Academic Unit (H.R.J.), Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2813-2860
M Mossa-BashaDepartments of Radiology (C.Y., N.B., M.M.-B.).ORCID 0000-0001-7798-8158
M E KooiDepartment of Radiology (M.E.K.), CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7562-5724
Z FanBiomedical Imaging Research Institute (D.L., Z.F.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-4286
D SalonerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.S.), University of California, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-8547
M WintermarkDepartment of Radiology (M.W.), Neuroradiology Division, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-3951
D J MikulisDivision of Neuroradiology (D.J.M.), Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-0892
B A WassermanThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (Y.Q., B.A.W.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8458-1778
Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of carotid artery atherosclerosis is conventionally based on measurements of luminal stenosis and surface irregularities using in vivo imaging techniques including sonography, CT and MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. However, histopathologic studies demonstrate considerable differences between plaques with identical degrees of stenosis and indicate that certain plaque features are associated with increased risk for ischemic events. The ability to look beyond the lumen using highly developed vessel wall imaging methods to identify plaque vulnerable to disruption has prompted an active debate as to whether a paradigm shift is needed to move away from relying on measurements of luminal stenosis for gauging the risk of ischemic injury. Further evaluation in randomized clinical trials will help to better define the exact role of plaque imaging in clinical decision-making. However, current carotid vessel wall imaging techniques can be informative. The goal of this article is to present the perspective of the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group as it relates to the current status of arterial wall imaging in carotid artery disease.

Indexed as

AgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionAtherosclerosisCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisConsensusHumansMaleTunica IntimaTunica MediaUltrasonographyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29326139
PMCPMC7410574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.