Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29326088›Full record

ArticleExperimental gerontology2018

Age effects of distinct immune checkpoint blockade treatments in a mouse melanoma model.

Álvaro Padrón, Vincent Hurez, Harshita B Gupta, Curtis A Clark, Sri Lakshmi Pandeswara, Bin Yuan, Robert S Svatek, Mary Jo Turk, Justin M Drerup, Rong Li and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental gerontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aging and cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Álvaro PadrónDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Vincent HurezDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Harshita B GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Curtis A ClarkDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Sri Lakshmi PandeswaraDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Bin YuanDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Robert S SvatekDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States; The UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Mary Jo TurkDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Justin M DrerupDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Rong LiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States; The UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Tyler J CurielDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States; Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States; The UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX 78229, United States; The Barshop Institute for Aging and Longevity Studies, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States. Electronic address: curielt@uthscsa.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Regulation of ER-beta Signaling in CarcinogenesisR01CA206529 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CURIEL, TYLER J., LI, RONG · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Role of BRCA1 phosphorylation in DNA DSB repair and genome stability maintenanceR01CA212674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HU, YANFEN, LI, RONG · 2017 to 2022
$1.9M
Regulation of hormone production by matrix proteinsR01CA161349 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LI, RONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Immune aspects of mTOR inhibition for cancer prevention (PQ5)R21CA170491 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CURIEL, TYLER J. · 2012 to 2013
$348k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161349NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212674NCI NIH HHS R21 CA170491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has shown remarkable recent progress. Immune checkpoint blocking antibodies have become the most successful anti-cancer agent class ever developed, with six distinct agents approved since 2011 for a wide variety of cancers. Although age is the biggest risk factor for cancer (aside from selected early-onset pediatric cancers), these agents were tested pre-clinically in young hosts, and there is remarkably little published on the effects of host age on treatment outcomes in pre-clinical studies or human clinical trials. The three principal immune checkpoints against which blocking antibodies have been FDA-approved for human use are CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1. We used a mouse model of transplantable, orthotopic B16 melanoma to test age effects of treatments with anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. All three agents were highly effective in treating young tumor-bearing hosts as expected. Anti-PD-L1 as a single agent had no effect on tumor growth in aged hosts, anti-CTLA-4 had detectable, modest effects and anti-PD-1 was essentially as effective in aged as in young hosts, the first single agent we have identified not to lose efficacy with age in this model. Other important differences in young versus aged hosts included lack of anti-CTLA-4-mediated depletion of intratumor regulatory T cells in aged hosts and poorer ability of all three agents to activate T cells in aged versus young hosts. Anti-CTLA-4 efficacy appeared to improve when combined with anti-PD-L1. Regulatory T cell depletion with FDA-approved denileukin diftitox did not improve treatment by any single agent. Aged mice tolerated treatments as well as young mice without obvious toxicities at equivalent doses.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsB7-H1 AntigenCTLA-4 AntigenDiphtheria ToxinDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunotherapyInterleukin-2MaleMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryB7-H1 AntigenCTLA-4 Antigendenileukin diftitoxDiphtheria ToxinInterleukin-2Programmed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAgingCancerImmune checkpointImmunityImmunotherapyMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID29326088
PMCPMC8851374
OpenAlexW2783072793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.