ArticleJournal of biomechanics2018
Dynamic structure of lower limb joint angles during walking post-stroke.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of ambulation functions through kinematic analysis in individuals with stroke: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Harmonic and power spectrum analysis of vertical ground reaction force in patients who have a stroke within 3 months.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Article
- Differences in Trunk Acceleration-Derived Gait Indexes in Stroke Subjects with and without Stroke-Induced Immunosuppression.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Assessment Methods Used in Chronic Stroke: A Scoping Review of Non-Linear Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterizing stroke-induced changes in the variability of lower limb kinematics using multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Dynamic structure of variability in joint angles and center of mass position during user-driven treadmill walking.Gait & posture · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariability in joint kinematics is necessary for adaptability and response to everyday perturbations; however, intrinsic neuromotor changes secondary to stroke often cause abnormal movement patterns. How these abnormal movement patterns relate to joint kinematic variability and its influence on post-stroke walking impairments is not well understood.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the movement variability at the individual joint level in the paretic and non-paretic limbs of individuals post-stroke.
methodsSeven individuals with hemiparesis post-stroke walked on a treadmill for two minutes at their self-selected speed and the average speed of the six-minute walk test while kinematics were recorded using motion-capture. Variability in hip, knee, and ankle flexion/extension angles during walking were quantified with the Lyapunov exponent (LyE). Interlimb differences were evaluated.
resultsThe paretic side LyE was higher than the non-paretic side at both self-selected speed (Hip: 50%; Knee: 74%), and the average speed of the 6-min walk test (Hip: 15%; Knee: 93%).
conclusionDifferences in joint kinematic variability between limbs of persons post-stroke supports further study of the source of non-paretic limb deviations as well as the clinical implications of joint kinematic variability in persons post-stroke. The development of bilaterally-targeted post-stroke gait interventions to address variability in both limbs may promote improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.