Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29325753›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2018

Induced hypothermia in patients with septic shock and respiratory failure (CASS): a randomised, controlled, open-label trial.

Theis Skovsgaard Itenov, Maria Egede Johansen, Morten Bestle, Katrin Thormar, Lars Hein, Louise Gyldensted, Anne Lindhardt, Henrik Christensen, Stine Estrup, Henrik Planck Pedersen and 19 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01455116 (Randomized Trial to Determine Whether Mild Induced Hypothermia Can Reduce Mortality in Adult Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01455116 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

Randomized Trial to Determine Whether Mild Induced Hypothermia Can Reduce Mortality in Adult Patients With Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Procalcitonin Study GroupRan2011 to 2016Enrolled433ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsMild Induced Hypothermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The poikilothermic hypothesis of sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Sepsis in the absence of fever: Determining the criteria for and feasibility of future therapeutic temperature management trials.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ten tips on fever.Intensive care medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Temperature control in sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Hibernation and hemostasis.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Microcirculation during surgery.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 14 institutions in 4 countries.

Theis Skovsgaard ItenovDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; Centre of Excellence in Immunity and Infection/Centre of Excellence for Personalised Medicine of Infectious Complications in Immune Deficiency, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Egede JohansenCentre of Excellence in Immunity and Infection/Centre of Excellence for Personalised Medicine of Infectious Complications in Immune Deficiency, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten BestleDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Katrin ThormarDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars HeinDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Louise GyldenstedDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Anne LindhardtDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik ChristensenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Stine EstrupDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Henrik Planck PedersenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Roskilde Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Matthew HarmonDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Uday Kant SoniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Horsens Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
Silvia Perez-ProttoCenter for Critical Care, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nicolai WescheDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Ulrik SkramDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
John Asger PetersenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas MohrDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Tina WaldauDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Lone Musaeus PoulsenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Ditte StrangeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicole P JuffermansDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Daniel I SesslerDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Else TønnesenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirsten MøllerDepartment of Neuroanesthesiology, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dennis Karsten KristensenCentre of Excellence in Immunity and Infection/Centre of Excellence for Personalised Medicine of Infectious Complications in Immune Deficiency, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alessandro Cozzi-LepriCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jens D LundgrenCentre of Excellence in Immunity and Infection/Centre of Excellence for Personalised Medicine of Infectious Complications in Immune Deficiency, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik JensenCentre of Excellence in Immunity and Infection/Centre of Excellence for Personalised Medicine of Infectious Complications in Immune Deficiency, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Respiratory Medicine Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark. Electronic address: jens.ulrik.jensen@regionh.dk.
Cooling and Surviving Septic Shock (CASS) Trial Collaboration
Gentofte Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKNordsjællands Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DKAcademic Medical Center · NLCleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKOutcomes Research Consortium · USRegional Hospital Horsens · DKRoskilde Sygehus · DKUniversity College London · GBCentre of Excellence for Health, Immunity and Infections · DK

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal models of serious infection suggest that 24 h of induced hypothermia improves circulatory and respiratory function and reduces mortality. We tested the hypothesis that a reduction of core temperature to 32-34°C attenuates organ dysfunction and reduces mortality in ventilator-dependent patients with septic shock.

methodsIn this randomised, controlled, open-label trial, we recruited patients from ten intensive care units (ICUs) in three countries in Europe and North America. Inclusion criteria for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were a mean arterial pressure of less than 70 mm Hg, mechanical ventilation in an ICU, age at least 50 years, predicted length of stay in the ICU at least 24 h, and recruitment into the study within 6 h of fulfilling inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were uncontrolled bleeding, clinically important bleeding disorder, recent open surgery, pregnancy or breastfeeding, or involuntary psychiatric admission. We randomly allocated patients 1:1 (with variable block sizes ranging from four to eight; stratified by predictors of mortality, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and study site) to routine thermal management or 24 h of induced hypothermia (target 32-34°C) followed by 48 h of normothermia (36-38°C). The primary endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly allocated patients except those for whom consent was withdrawn or who were discovered to meet an exclusion criterion after randomisation but before receiving the trial intervention). Patients and health-care professionals giving the intervention were not masked to treatment allocation, but assessors of the primary outcome were. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01455116.

findingsBetween Nov 1, 2011, and Nov 4, 2016, we screened 5695 patients. After recruitment of 436 of the planned 560 participants, the trial was terminated for futility (220 [50%] randomly allocated to hypothermia and 216 [50%] to routine thermal management). In the hypothermia group, 96 (44·2%) of 217 died within 30 days versus 77 (35·8%) of 215 in the routine thermal management group (difference 8·4% [95% CI -0·8 to 17·6]; relative risk 1·2 [1·0-1·6]; p=0·07]).

interpretationAmong patients with septic shock and ventilator-dependent respiratory failure, induced hypothermia does not reduce mortality. Induced hypothermia should not be used in patients with septic shock.

fundingTrygfonden, Lundbeckfonden, and the Danish National Research Foundation.

Indexed as

AgedAPACHEEuropeFemaleHumansHypothermia, InducedIntensive Care UnitsMaleNorth AmericaRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyShock, SepticTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29325753
PMCPMC10928558
OpenAlexW2782660493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.